Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Numerical Estimation of the Pseudo-Jahn-Teller Effect Using Nonadiabatic Coupling Integrals in Monocyclic and
Shiro Koseki1,2, Azumao Toyota3, Takashi Muramatsu3
1Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka Prefecture University , 1-1 Gakuen-cho, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan.
Abstract:
The pseudo-Jahn-Teller (pJT) effect in monocyclic and bicyclic conjugated molecules was investigated by using the state-averaged multiconfiguration self-consistent field (MCSCF) method, together with the 6-31G(d,p) basis sets. Following the perturbation theory, the force constant along a normal mode Q is given by the sum of the classical force constant and the vibronic contribution (VC) resulting from the interaction of the ground state with excited states. The latter is given as the sum of individual contributions arising from vibronic interactions between the ground state and excited states. In the present work, each VC was calculated on the basis of nonadiabatic coupling (NAC) integrals. Furthermore, the classical force constant was estimated by taking advantage of the VC and the force constant obtained by vibrational analyses. For pentalene and heptalene, the present method seems to overestimate the VC in absolute value because of the small energy gap between the ground state and the lowest excited state. However, we are confident that the VC and the classical force constant for the other molecules are reasonable in magnitude in comparison with available literature information. Thus, it is proved that the present method is applicable and useful for numerical estimation of pJT effect.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Debye–Huckel–Onsager Conductance Equation

