Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shoe heel-toe drop affects running economy.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2026
Same author

More isn't always better: Too much exoskeleton torque can disrupt balance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The running economy and biomechanics of competitive distance runners wearing advanced footwear technology spikes.

European journal of applied physiology·2026
Same author

Real-time visual feedback affects peak propulsive horizontal force and metabolic cost in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation during walking.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2026
Same author

The effects of leg prosthesis stiffness and take-off board stiffness on long jump performance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Effects of prosthetic ankle power and foot stiffness category on biomechanical asymmetry and knee moment during walking at different speeds.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.4K

Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Running-Specific Prostheses.

Owen N Beck1, Paolo Taboga1, Alena M Grabowski1,2

  • 1Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.

Plos One
|December 16, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Prosthetic stiffness varies significantly between models and is not accurately represented by manufacturer categories. Objective stiffness measurements are crucial for athletes with leg amputations to optimize running performance and function.

More Related Videos

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
11:16

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis

Published on: July 22, 2014

16.8K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs
03:55

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.4K
Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
11:16

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis

Published on: July 22, 2014

16.8K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs
03:55

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Prosthetics Engineering
  • Sports Science

Background:

  • Running prostheses' mechanical stiffness impacts amputee athletes' function.
  • Manufacturers use subjective categories, not performance metrics, for recommendations.
  • Actual stiffness values (kN/m) of running prostheses are largely unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize and disseminate mechanical stiffness values of running prostheses.
  • To enable objective evaluation of prosthetic function by researchers, clinicians, and athletes.
  • To investigate the relationship between stiffness, prosthetic characteristics, and running biomechanics.

Main Methods:

  • Characterized stiffness of 55 running prostheses (various models, categories, heights).
  • Used forces and angles representative of transtibial amputees during running.
  • Applied 2nd-degree polynomial and linear functions to force-displacement profiles.

Main Results:

  • 2nd-degree polynomial better explained variance in force-displacement profiles (4.4% more, p<0.001).
  • Prosthetic stiffness varied significantly across manufacturer categories and models (p<0.001).
  • Stiffness decreased 10-39% at running angles (10°-25°) compared to neutral (p<0.001).
  • Stiffness inversely related to height in J-shaped prostheses (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Prosthetic stiffness is highly variable and depends on model, height, and alignment.
  • Current stiffness categories are inadequate for objective functional assessment.
  • Testing prostheses under activity-specific demands is essential for accurate characterization.
  • Altered stiffness profiles may indirectly influence athlete comfort and performance.