Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Spontaneous imagery scanning and hemisphere function.

C C French1, P Brightwell

  • 1University of London Goldsmiths' College, New Cross, U.K.

Neuropsychologia
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emotion-focused coping and distraction: sex differences in the influence of anxiety sensitivity during noxious heat stimulation.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2012
Same author

Dying to know the truth: visions of a dying brain, or false memories?

Lancet (London, England)·2002
Same author

Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions.

The Journal of psychology·1998
Same author

Mistakes around the clock: errors in memory for the orientation of numerals.

The Journal of psychology·1998
Same author

Cognitive processing and trait anxiety in typically developing children: evidence for an interpretation bias.

Journal of abnormal psychology·1997
Same author

Hypomania, anxiety and the emotional Stroop.

The British journal of clinical psychology·1996
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study investigated visual attention and spatial memory using dot patterns and arrow cues. Reaction time increased with distance, and right visual field (RVF) presentation improved accuracy and speed compared to the left visual field (LVF).

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Understanding visual attention mechanisms is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Spatial memory and its interaction with visual cues are key research areas.
  • Hemispheric differences in visual processing are well-documented.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between reaction time and spatial distance in a visual memory task.
  • To investigate the effect of visual field presentation (right vs. left) on accuracy and reaction time.
  • To explore how spatial memory is influenced by simple dot patterns and subsequent arrow cues.

Main Methods:

  • 18 subjects viewed simple dot patterns tachistoscopically for 5 seconds.
  • A fixation field was presented for 3 seconds, followed by an arrow cue in either the right visual field (RVF) or left visual field (LVF).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Arrow cues indicated target locations at 4, 6, or 8 cm, or were non-indicative.

    • Main Results:

    • Reaction time showed a linear relationship with the distance of the dot locations.
    • Right visual field (RVF) presentation resulted in higher accuracy than left visual field (LVF) presentation at 6 and 8 cm distances.
    • Reaction time was faster in the RVF compared to the LVF at a 6 cm distance.

    Conclusions:

    • Spatial memory recall is influenced by the distance of the original stimuli.
    • The right visual field demonstrates superior performance in certain aspects of visual attention and spatial memory tasks.
    • Hemispheric asymmetry in visual processing affects both accuracy and reaction speed.