Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

1.1K
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
1.1K
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

1.1K
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
1.1K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.2K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.2K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

3.0K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
3.0K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.2K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.2K
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test01:19

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

1.2K
The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic Determinants of Pulmonary Artery Size in over 50,000 Subjects with and without COPD.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Integrative Phenogroups Based on Lung Imaging and Spirometry from Young Adulthood to Midlife and Associations With Subclinical Cardiac Structure and Function.

Chest·2026
Same author

AI for the assessment and discovery of morphological-molecular biomarker relationships in hematologic malignancies.

Blood reviews·2026
Same author

Characterization of CT Imaging-Derived Pulmonary Vascular Abnormalities Associated With Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Lung Disease.

Chest·2026
Same author

Improving Pre-trained Adult Glioma Segmentation Models using only Post-processing Techniques.

Segmentation, classification, and synthesis for brain tumors and traumatic brain injuries : MICCAI 2025 Challenges: BraTS-Lighthouse 2025 and AIMS-TBI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025,...·2026
Same author

Adaptable Segmentation Pipeline for Diverse Brain Tumors with Radiomic-guided Subtyping and Lesion-Wise Model Ensemble.

Segmentation, classification, and synthesis for brain tumors and traumatic brain injuries : MICCAI 2025 Challenges: BraTS-Lighthouse 2025 and AIMS-TBI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025,...·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Automated Measurement of Pulmonary Emphysema and Small Airway Remodeling in Cigarette Smoke-exposed Mice
10:37

Automated Measurement of Pulmonary Emphysema and Small Airway Remodeling in Cigarette Smoke-exposed Mice

Published on: January 16, 2015

13.7K

DERIVATION OF A TEST STATISTIC FOR EMPHYSEMA QUANTIFICATION.

Gonzalo Vegas-Sanchez-Ferrero1, George Washko2, Farbod N Rahaghi2

  • 1Applied Chest Imaging Lab., Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Biomedical Image Technologies, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid & CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain.

Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
|December 16, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new statistical method for emphysema quantification shows superior accuracy to standard density masking. This approach improves emphysema detection in COPD patients using lung imaging analysis.

Keywords:
Emphysema quantificationnon-central Gammastatistical testtruncated random variable

More Related Videos

Measurement of the Pressure-volume Curve in Mouse Lungs
09:49

Measurement of the Pressure-volume Curve in Mouse Lungs

Published on: January 27, 2015

19.6K
Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
08:44

Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies

Published on: February 2, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Automated Measurement of Pulmonary Emphysema and Small Airway Remodeling in Cigarette Smoke-exposed Mice
10:37

Automated Measurement of Pulmonary Emphysema and Small Airway Remodeling in Cigarette Smoke-exposed Mice

Published on: January 16, 2015

13.7K
Measurement of the Pressure-volume Curve in Mouse Lungs
09:49

Measurement of the Pressure-volume Curve in Mouse Lungs

Published on: January 27, 2015

19.6K
Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
08:44

Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies

Published on: February 2, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Density masking is a standard method for quantifying emphysema in CT scans.
  • It relies on a fixed threshold (typically -910 to -950 HU) validated by histology.
  • Clinical use of density masking is widespread in emphysema assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a statistically rigorous method for emphysema quantification.
  • To improve upon the accuracy and sensitivity of standard density masking.
  • To validate a novel statistical approach for emphysema detection in COPD patients.

Main Methods:

  • Modeled local image intensity distributions using a non-central Gamma approximation for normal and emphysematous lung tissue.
  • Developed a test statistic based on the sample mean of a truncated non-central Gamma random variable.
  • Validated the statistical method on a large dataset of 1337 CT scans from subjects with COPD across 9 scanner models.

Main Results:

  • The proposed statistical method demonstrated superior performance compared to standard density masking.
  • Emphysema detection accuracy increased by 17% using the new statistical approach.
  • The method achieved an overall accuracy of 94.09% in the tested COPD cohort.

Conclusions:

  • A novel statistical inference method provides a more accurate quantification of emphysema.
  • This approach offers a robust and improved alternative to traditional density masking for emphysema assessment.
  • The findings support the clinical utility of advanced statistical methods in medical imaging for COPD diagnosis and management.