Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.5K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.5K
Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology01:28

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

946
Three-dimensional imaging techniques are essential in cell biology, allowing researchers to visualize intricate cellular structures with high resolution. Two prominent methods, Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy (DIC) and Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM), provide distinct advantages for imaging live and thick specimens, respectively.Differential Interference Contrast MicroscopyDIC microscopy enhances contrast in transparent, unstained samples by converting phase...
946

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain abscess following right maxillary odontogenic infection in a patient with diabetes mellitus: a case report.

Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2025
Same author

Multi-Scale 3D Cephalometric Landmark Detection Based on Direct Regression with 3D CNN Architectures.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Primary tooth aspiration during conscious sedation with N<sub>2</sub>O: foreign body removal with rigid bronchoscopy.

Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine·2024
Same author

Automated Cephalometric Landmark Detection Using Deep Reinforcement Learning.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2023
Same author

Reconstruction of mandibular defects in osteoradionecrosis and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw using fibula free flap and management of postoperative wound infections.

Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery·2022
Same author

A deep learning model based on concatenation approach to predict the time to extract a mandibular third molar tooth.

BMC oral health·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.5K

Are Three-Dimensional Monitors More Appropriate Than Two-Dimensional Monitors in the Three-Dimensional Analysis?

Jaemyung Ahn1, Jongrak Hong

  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|December 16, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Using 3D monitors for orthognathic surgery analysis improves facial landmark identification accuracy and efficiency compared to 2D monitors. This enhances diagnostic precision for surgical planning.

More Related Videos

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.8K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

610

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.5K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.8K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

610

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Computer-Aided Diagnosis

Background:

  • Three-dimensional (3D) analysis of computed tomography (CT) reconstructions is standard in orthognathic surgery.
  • Facial landmark identification is crucial for diagnostic accuracy and surgical planning.
  • Current methods often involve viewing 3D reconstructions on 2D monitors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and efficiency of facial landmark identification using 3D versus 2D monitors.
  • To evaluate the impact of monitor type on coordinate measurements of facial landmarks.
  • To determine if 3D monitors offer advantages for orthognathic surgery diagnosis.

Main Methods:

  • 3D reconstructions of facial bone CT data from 30 patients were analyzed.
  • Four researchers identified 33 facial landmarks multiple times on both 2D and 3D monitors.
  • Measurements included x, y, and z coordinates, and time taken for identification.

Main Results:

  • High inter-reader reliability (>0.8 intraclass coefficient) was observed for both 2D and 3D monitor analyses.
  • Landmark identification was faster on 3D monitors (2 min 25 sec) compared to 2D monitors (2 min 46 sec).
  • Variance in coordinate measurements differed between 2D and 3D monitors, particularly for landmarks near the facial midline.

Conclusions:

  • 3D monitor use may enhance the accuracy of facial landmark identification in orthognathic surgery.
  • Faster identification times and potential improvements in coordinate accuracy suggest benefits for 3D displays.
  • Utilizing 3D monitors could lead to more precise facial diagnoses and surgical planning.