Are Three-Dimensional Monitors More Appropriate Than Two-Dimensional Monitors in the Three-Dimensional Analysis?

In orthognathic surgery, three-dimensional (3D) program-based analysis of 3D reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) images is commonly used, and images viewed on a monitor. The authors compared the coordinates of facial landmarks on images in a 3D program displayed on a two-dimensional (2D) (standard) or 3D monitor. Facial bone CT data from 30 patients were reconstructed in 3D. Four researchers identified 33 facial landmarks, 3 times each on 2D and 3D monitors, for each patient, by their x-, y-, and z-coordinates. The time taken to complete these identifications was measured.For each set of coordinates, the average intraclass coefficient was >0.8 for 2D and 3D analyses, as well as among 4 readers. It took on average of 2 minutes 46 seconds to identify the landmarks on the 2D monitor, compared with 2 minutes 25 seconds on the 3D monitor. The variance of individual coordinates differed when measured on 2D or 3D monitor. The landmarks affected were located near the median region of the facial area, and are important for setting the reference sagittal plane during diagnosis for orthognathic surgery. Therefore, identifying facial landmarks using 3D monitors may be helpful for conducting accurate facial diagnoses.