Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.0K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.0K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.3K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.3K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.8K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.8K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.9K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.1K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.1K
Interval Level of Measurement00:55

Interval Level of Measurement

19.8K
For effective statistical analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
19.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatiotemporal Modeling Approach to Mapping Geographic and Temporal Variation in Cancer Incidence Rates for US Counties.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Assessment of Rebound in Cancer Diagnoses in California in 2022, by Stage, Sociodemographic Factors, and Rurality.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2025
Same author

Recent Spatiotemporal Patterns of US Lung Cancer by Histologic Type.

Frontiers in public health·2017
Same author

Using Gini coefficient to determining optimal cluster reporting sizes for spatial scan statistics.

International journal of health geographics·2016
Same author

Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges.

International journal of health geographics·2014
Same author

Predicting US- and state-level cancer counts for the current calendar year: Part I: evaluation of temporal projection methods for mortality.

Cancer·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Confidence intervals for rate ratios between geographic units.

Li Zhu1, Linda W Pickle2, James B Pearson2

  • 1Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Suite 4E346, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. li.zhu@nih.gov.

International Journal of Health Geographics
|December 17, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method to calculate confidence intervals for rate ratios by accounting for both area overlap and spatial autocorrelation. This improved statistical approach offers more accurate results, especially when spatial patterns are present in geographic health data.

Keywords:
Cancer statisticsConfidence intervalsLinked micromap plotRate ratioSpatial autocorrelationVariance

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

36.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

36.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Spatial Epidemiology
  • Public Health Data Analysis

Background:

  • Geographic rate ratios are crucial for public health policy.
  • Existing methods for confidence intervals of rate ratios do not fully account for spatial autocorrelation.
  • Understanding geographic disparities in health outcomes requires accurate statistical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel statistical method for calculating rate ratio confidence intervals.
  • To incorporate both area overlap and spatial autocorrelation into variance calculations.
  • To improve the accuracy of confidence intervals for geographic health data.

Main Methods:

  • A new method was developed to partition rate ratio variances into three components: no correlation, overlap correlation, and spatial autocorrelation.
  • The proposed method was applied to simulated and real-world cancer mortality and incidence data.
  • Statistical analysis focused on comparing the proposed method with existing techniques.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method demonstrated substantial improvements over existing methods when spatial autocorrelation was present and strong.
  • The accuracy of confidence intervals increased with the strength and scale of spatial autocorrelation.
  • When spatial autocorrelation was absent, the new method performed comparably to existing approaches.

Conclusions:

  • The new method accurately calculates rate ratio confidence intervals by considering spatial autocorrelation.
  • The calculations are straightforward to implement.
  • This method is recommended for all rate ratio confidence interval calculations to enhance accuracy.