Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

315
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
315
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

550
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
550

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Linking compromise and responsibility attribution to risky decision-making in dyadic foraging.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Utilizing social foraging as a framework to study decisions in groups.

iScience·2026
Same author

Transdiagnostic mental health symptom dimensions predict use of flexible model-based inference in complex environments.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Spatially periodic computation in the entorhinal-hippocampal circuit during navigation.

eLife·2026
Same author

Hypothetical nudges provide directional but noisy estimates of real behavior change.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

An intracranial dissection of human escape circuits.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.1K

Differences in Behavior and Brain Activity during Hypothetical and Real Choices.

Colin Camerer1, Dean Mobbs2

  • 1Computation and Neural Systems Program, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|December 17, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive science studies often use hypothetical scenarios, but real-world actions involve different brain processes. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurately modeling human decision-making and behavior.

Keywords:
affective realismchoicedecision makingdecision neurosciencehypothetical biasvaluation

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Cognitive scientists investigate psychological and neural mechanisms driving real-world actions.
  • Real behaviors are consequential commitments, distinct from imagined choices.
  • Current research often relies on hypothetical stimuli for practical reasons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence comparing psychological and neural processes in hypothetical versus real behavior.
  • To assess the validity of generalizing findings from hypothetical tasks to real-world decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies examining hypothetical and real choice tasks.
  • Analysis of cognitive and neural data from both types of behavioral paradigms.

Main Results:

  • Hypothetical choice tasks may not fully capture the brain circuitry involved in real decision-making.
  • Differences exist in the psychological and neural processes underlying hypothetical and real actions.
  • Generalizing from hypothetical studies to real behavior requires careful consideration of these discrepancies.

Conclusions:

  • Hypothetical tasks provide an incomplete representation of real behavior and associated neural activity.
  • Further research is needed to bridge the gap between hypothetical and real-world decision-making models.
  • Accurate understanding of cognitive processes requires studying behavior in ecologically valid contexts.