Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

457
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
457
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.1K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.1K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

560
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
560

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adhesion index integrates cell and bacterial responses to titanium across protein conditioning and surface roughness.

Biofilm·2026
Same author

Characteristics of People Who Inject Drugs Approached for Injection Assistance in Rural Kentucky.

Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs·2026
Same author

GRN rs5848 variant associates with TDP-43 pathology and cancer in opposite directions.

Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology·2026
Same author

Systematic contextual biases in SegmentNT potentially relevant to other nucleotide transformer models.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

scVIP: personalized modeling of single-cell transcriptomes for developmental and disease phenotypes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Data-driven thresholds for standardized classification of severe Alzheimer's disease neuropathology using digital neuropathology.

Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Abstracts from Specialized Centers of Research Excellence (SCORE) on Sex Differences 2025 annual meeting.

BMC proceedings·2026
Same journal

Conference abstracts the 1st UDOM scientific conference on health: healthy lives and well-being for all: opportunities and challenges.

BMC proceedings·2026
Same journal

Entrepreneurship beyond the lab: commercializing your creative outputs.

BMC proceedings·2026
Same journal

The need to strengthen laboratory leadership, systems, and networks to enhance outbreak detection and resilience in Africa: proceedings of a regional workshop.

BMC proceedings·2026
Same journal

Abstracts from the Globesync Community Research and Sustainability 2025 (GlobeCoReS 2025).

BMC proceedings·2026
Same journal

Bauru International Craniofacial Symposium: Comprehensive Care, Policy and Advocacy Proceedings.

BMC proceedings·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.4K

Comparing performance of non-tree-based and tree-based association mapping methods.

Katherine L Thompson1, David W Fardo2

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0003 USA.

BMC Proceedings
|December 17, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares two genetic association mapping methods for linking genome variations to traits. It evaluates methods that consider or ignore evolutionary relationships using simulated data.

More Related Videos

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.6K
Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.4K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.6K
Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Linking genetic variation to quantitative traits is crucial in biomedical and biological sciences.
  • Advances in sequencing technology and statistical methods facilitate genetic data analysis.
  • Two main classes of association mapping methods exist: those accounting for relatedness and those ignoring it.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of association mapping methods that account for versus ignore evolutionary relatedness.
  • To evaluate these methods using simulated genetic data.

Main Methods:

  • Applied two classes of statistical association mapping methods to simulated genetic datasets.
  • One method class accounts for the evolutionary relatedness among individuals.
  • The other method class ignores evolutionary relationships.

Main Results:

  • The study compared the effectiveness of the two association mapping approaches.
  • Results are based on analyses performed on simulated data.

Conclusions:

  • The comparison provides insights into the strengths and limitations of different genetic association mapping strategies.
  • Findings aid in selecting appropriate methods for analyzing genetic variation and quantitative traits.