Causal effect estimation in sequencing studies: a Bayesian method to account for confounder adjustment uncertainty
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
Published on: August 3, 2018
Chi Wang1, Jinpeng Liu2, David W Fardo3
1Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 725 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA ; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA.
Abstract:
Estimating the causal effect of a single nucleotide variant (SNV) on clinical phenotypes is of interest in many genetic studies. The effect estimation may be confounded by other SNVs as a result of linkage disequilibrium as well as demographic and clinical characteristics. Because a large number of these other variables, which we call potential confounders, are collected, it is challenging to select and adjust for the variables that truly confound the causal effect. The Bayesian adjustment for confounding (BAC) method has been proposed as a general method to estimate the average causal effect in the presence of a large number of potential confounders under the assumption of no unmeasured confounders. In this paper, we explore the application of BAC in genetic studies using Genetic Analysis Workshop 19 exome sequencing data. Our results show that BAC can efficiently estimate the causal effect of genetic variants with adjustment for confounding. Consequently, BAC may serve as a useful tool for genome-wide association studies data analysis to effectively assess the causal effect of genetic variants and the impact of potential interventions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Censoring Survival Data
Causality in Epidemiology
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

