Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings
Published on: September 30, 2019
Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Local Monitoring: Experimental Simulation, and Analysis of Displacements
Ludovico Biagi1, Florin Cătălin Grec2, Marco Negretti3
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Como 22100, Italy. ludovico.biagi@polimi.it.
Abstract:
The geodetic monitoring of local displacements and deformations is often needed for civil engineering structures and natural phenomena like, for example, landslides. A local permanent GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) network can be installed: receiver positions in the interest area are estimated and monitored with respect to reference stations. Usually, GNSS geodetic receivers are adopted and provide results with accuracies at the millimeter level: however, they are very expensive and the initial cost and the risk of damage and loss can discourage this approach. In this paper the accuracy and the reliability of low-cost u-blox GNSS receivers are experimentally investigated for local monitoring. Two experiments are analyzed. In the first, a baseline (65 m long) between one geodetic reference receiver and one u-blox is continuously observed for one week: the data are processed by hourly sessions and the results provide comparisons between two processing packages and a preliminary accuracy assessment. Then, a network composed of one geodetic and two u-blox receivers is set up. One u-blox is installed on a device (slide) that allows to apply controlled displacements. The geodetic and the other u-blox (at about 130 m) act as references. The experiment lasts about two weeks. The data are again processed by hourly sessions. The estimated displacements of the u-blox on the slide are analyzed and compared with the imposed displacements. All of the results are encouraging: in the first experiment the standard deviations of the residuals are smaller than 5 mm both in the horizontal and vertical; in the second, they are slightly worse but still satisfactory (5 mm in the horizontal and 13 mm in vertical) and the imposed displacements are almost correctly identified.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Field Application of Global Positioning System
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
Introduction to Global Positioning System
Errors in Global Positioning System
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments

