Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Diagnostic Evaluation of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Clinician Compliance with Published Guidelines
Alexis Tchaconas1, Andrew Adesman
1*Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, New Hyde Park, NY; †Department of Pediatrics, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.
Insights
Child neurologists and developmental-behavioral pediatricians frequently order unindicated diagnostic tests or miss recommended ones for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This includes failing to order crucial genetic tests, highlighting a need for updated clinical guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnostics
Background:
- Current diagnostic practices for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by specialists may not align with established guidelines.
- Variations in ordering laboratory tests can impact diagnostic accuracy and healthcare costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the extent to which child neurologists (CNs) and developmental-behavioral pediatricians (DBPs) adhere to recommended diagnostic testing for children with ASD.
- To identify discrepancies in ordering non-indicated or failing to order indicated tests.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to CNs and DBPs in the United States regarding routine laboratory tests for preschool children with ASD and intellectual disability (ID) or without ID.
- Chi-square tests were used to compare testing practices between CNs and DBPs.
Main Results:
- A high percentage of physicians (76.8% for ASD+ID, 76.4% for ASD-ID) ordered at least one inappropriate test.
- CNs were more likely than DBPs to order EEGs and MRIs.
- Recommended genetic tests were frequently omitted, particularly for ASD-ID (40% of respondents).
Conclusions:
- Many CNs and DBPs deviate from recommended diagnostic testing protocols for ASD.
- There is a significant gap in ordering recommended molecular genetic tests.
- Updated and better-disseminated clinical guidelines are necessary to improve diagnostic practices.
Objective:
To assess to what extent child neurologists (CNs) and developmental-behavioral pediatricians (DBPs) order diagnostic tests that are not recommended/indicated and/or fail to order tests that are recommended/indicated when evaluating children with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Method:
CNs and DBPs in the United States were asked which laboratory tests they would "routinely order" for a preschool child with ASD and IQ = 58 (ASD + Intellectual Disability (ID)), and a preschool child with ASD and IQ = 85 (ASD-ID). Chi-square tests were performed to identify differences (CNs vs DBPs) in laboratory testing.
Results:
The sample consisted of 267 respondents (127 CN's; 140 DBPs). When evaluating ASD + ID or ASD - ID, inappropriate tests (≥1) were ordered by 76.8% and 76.4% of MDs, respectively. There was no significant difference between specialties in compliance with evaluation guidelines for ASD + ID (CN = 20.5% vs DBP = 16.4%; χ = 0.73). No significant differences were noted (DBP vs CN) regarding the percent ordering inappropriate tests for either clinical case or within each specialty when comparing testing for ASD + ID versus ASD - ID. Relative to DBPs, CNs were more likely to order EEGs and MRIs when evaluating children with ASD + ID or ASD - ID. 10% and 40% of respondents did not order any recommended genetic tests when evaluating ASD + ID and ASD - ID, respectively.
Conclusion:
When evaluating children with ASD, many CNs and DBPs fail to order tests that should be routinely performed and often order tests that are not routinely indicated yet are neither benign nor inexpensive. Recommended molecular genetic tests are often not ordered. Clinical guidelines must be updated and better promulgated.
Related Concept Videos
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

