Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Low-impedance Baseline Values Predict Severe Esophagitis
Judith Cohen Sabban1, Gabriela D Bertoldi, Federico Ussher
1*Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit †Pathology Unit, Hospital Italiano Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires. Argentina.
Insights
Esophageal baseline impedance (BI) measured by multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) in channel 6 can accurately predict severe esophagitis in children. This non-invasive method may reduce the need for repeat upper endoscopies in pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Gastrointestinal Physiology
Background:
- Esophagitis diagnosis in children often relies on invasive procedures like upper endoscopy with biopsies.
- Predictive biomarkers for severe esophageal inflammation are needed to guide clinical management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if esophageal baseline impedance (BI) values in children can predict the presence and severity of esophagitis.
- To assess the utility of multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) in diagnosing pediatric esophagitis.
Main Methods:
- Review of MII tracings and upper endoscopy/biopsy results from 87 children (3-17 years) suspected of reflux and esophagitis.
- Exclusion of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.
- Analysis of mean BI in different MII channels against macroscopic and histological esophagitis scores.
Main Results:
- Channel 6 BI <900 Ω/s showed 100% positive and negative predictive value for grade 3 or macroscopic esophagitis.
- Children with no or mild esophagitis (biopsy score 0-2) had BI >2000 Ω/s in channel 6.
- Histologic grade 3 esophagitis impacted esophageal epithelium integrity.
Conclusions:
- Esophageal BI in channel 6 is a highly accurate predictor of severe esophagitis in children.
- MII-derived BI may serve as a valuable tool for predicting severe esophageal inflammation and potentially reducing the need for repeat endoscopies.
- Severe esophagitis can affect esophageal integrity even without visible macroscopic changes.
Objectives:
The aim of the study was to determine whether esophageal baseline impedance (BI) values in children could be predictive of esophagitis.
Materials And Methods:
Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) tracings of children 3 to 17 years of age suspected of having gastroesophageal reflux and esophagitis, who had also undergone upper endoscopy with multiple esophageal biopsies, were reviewed. Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis were excluded. Esophagitis was assessed by macroscopic and microscopic parameters. Esophageal histology was reported by 2 blinded independent pathologists unaware of the MII results. Mean BI was automatically calculated in the different MII channels (ch) by the specific software without removing any episode of increased/decreased BI. BI results were plotted against macroscopic and histological scores for each channel.
Results:
Tracings of 87 children, 53 boys, were evaluated. Mean age was 7.4 years: 45 had histologic esophagitis, 8 macroscopic. Histologic mild esophagitis (grade 1) was observed in 30, and 15 had moderate to severe esophagitis (grade 2-3). Ten had grade 3 esophagitis. Eight had macroscopic esophagitis as well.
Results:
in channel 6 of the MII, all 10 patients with grade 3 esophagitis and the 8 with macroscopic esophagitis had a BI <900 Ω/s (positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 100%), whereas none of those having a biopsy score of 0 to 2 or no endoscopic evidence of esophagitis had a mean BI below 2000 Ω/s.
Conclusions:
The evaluation of the BI measured in channel 6 gave us 100% prediction of grade 3 and macroscopic esophagitis. BI on channel 6 may be useful to predict severe esophageal mucosa inflammation and could potentially be used for follow-up evaluation, rather than repeating an upper endoscopy. In addition, it would seem that grade 3 esophagitis even in the absence of macroscopic esophagitis affects the integrity of the esophageal epithelium.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...

