Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Triple Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Valvuloplasty for Patients with Recurrent Mitral Valve Stenosis: Long-Term
Paweł Tyczyński1, Zbigniew Chmielak1, Witold Rużyłło1
1Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Background:
A third percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty (PMBV) may provide a means of treating symptomatic patients with re-restenosis after successful initial and second valvuloplasties, though data related to the long-term safety and efficacy of a third PMBV are lacking. The study aim was to determine the immediate and long-term clinical outcome in patients who underwent a third PMBV to treat recurrent mitral stenosis.
Methods:
Among a total of 1,849 patients who underwent PMBV at the authors' institution, seven females (mean age 38.5 ± 12.2 years at the first procedure) required repeat second and third PMBVs. The mean interval between the first and second valvuloplasties was 6.4 ± 2.5 years, and between the first and third valvuloplasties was 12.5 ± 6.5 years. All procedures were performed using the Inoue balloon system.
Results:
Second and third PMBVs resulted in a significant increase in mitral valve area (MVA), from 1.1 ± 0.1 cm2 to 1.6 ± 0.2 cm2, and from 1.0 ± 0.2 cm2 to 1.6 ± 0.4 cm2, respectively. However, as mitral degeneration progressed, four patients required mitral valve replacement (MVR) at 9.2 ± 5.8 years (range: 6-18 years) after the third PMBV. The preoperative MVA of these patients was 0.97 ± 0.1 cm2. One patient died due to surgical complications, while the fifth and sixth patients remain under clinical observation. If patients have a fourth recurrence of mitral stenosis they are no longer considered to be suitable candidates for re-PMBV. The seventh patient died at the age of 84 years.
Conclusions:
A repeat, third PMBV is a safe and feasible procedure in selected patients with recurrent stenosis after successful first and second valvuloplasties. Although the third procedure provides good immediate results, the long-term outcome is not satisfactory. Nonetheless, a third PMBV would allow MVR surgery to be postponed for a few years.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

