Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Coronary sinus activation patterns in patients with and without left bundle branch block undergoing electroanatomic
Maurizio Del Greco1, Alessandro Zorzi2, Irene Di Matteo3
1Santa Maria del Carmine Hospital, Rovereto TN, Italy,.
Background:
Implantation of the left ventricular (LV) lead in segments with delayed electrical activation may improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount and regional distribution of LV electrical delay (LVED) in patients with or without left bundle branch block (LBBB).
Methods:
We enrolled 60 patients who underwent electroanatomic mapping system-guided CRT device implantation. Activation mapping of the coronary sinus (CS) branches was performed using an insulated guidewire. LVED was defined as the interval between the beginning of the QRS complex on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and the local electrogram and expressed in milliseconds or as percentage of the total QRS duration (LVED%).
Results:
Forty-three patients showed a LBBB and 17 a non-LBBB electrocardiographic pattern. A total of 148 CS branches (mean 2.5 per patient; range 2-4 per patient) were mapped. Patients with LBBB showed higher maximum LVED (135 ms [108-150 ms] vs 100 ms [103-110 ms]; P < .001) and LVED% (86% [79%-89%] vs 72% [54%-80%]; P < .001) than did patients without LBBB. The maximum LVED was recorded in mid-basal anterolateral or inferolateral LV segments (traditional CRT targets), significantly more often in patients with LBBB than in patients without LBBB (85% vs 59%; P = .02). The number of CS branches showing LVED >50% of the total QRS duration, >75% of the total QRS duration, and >85 ms was significantly higher in patients with LBBB than in patients without LBBB.
Conclusion:
Patients without LBBB showed lower LVED and more heterogeneous electrical activation of the CS than did patients with LBBB. This finding may contribute to a lower rate of response to CRT of patients without LBBB and suggests the use of activation mapping to guide LV lead placement.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations