Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants
Published on: May 4, 2018
Phylogenetic analysis reveals the taxonomically diverse distribution of the Pseudomonas putida group
Kenta Yonezuka1, Jun Shimodaira, Michiro Tabata
1Department of Bioengineering, Nagaoka University of Technology.
Abstract:
Pseudomonas putida is well-known for degradation activities for a variety of compounds and its infections have been reported. Thus, P. putida includes both clinical and nonclinical isolates. To date, no reports have examined the phylogenetic relationship between clinical and nonclinical isolates of the P. putida group. In this study, fifty-nine strains of P. putida group containing twenty-six clinical, and thirty-three nonclinical, isolates, were subjected to phylogenetic and taxonomic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and nine housekeeping gene sequences, including argS, dnaN, dnaQ, era, gltA, gyrB, ppnK, rpoB, and rpoD, to obtain insights into the diversity of species in this group. More than 97.6% similarity was observed among the 16S rRNA gene sequences of all the strains examined, indicating that the resolution of 16S rRNA gene sequences is inadequate. Phylogenetic analysis based on the individual housekeeping genes listed above improved the resolution of the phylogenetic trees, which are different from each other. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) based on the concatenated sequences of the nine genes significantly improved the resolution of the phylogenetic tree, and yielded approximately the same results as average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis, suggesting its high reliability. ANI analysis classified the fifty-nine strains into twenty-six species containing seventeen singletons and nine strain clusters based on the 95% threshold. It also indicated the mixed distribution of clinical and nonclinical isolates in the six clusters, suggesting that the genomic difference between clinical and nonclinical isolates of the P. putida group is subtle. The P. putida type strain NBRC 14164T is a singleton that is independently located from the P. putida strains distributed among the six clusters, suggesting that the classification of these strains and the differentiation of species in the P. putida group should be re-examined. This study greatly expands insights into the phylogenetic diversity of the P. putida group.
Insights
Phylogenetic analysis of Pseudomonas putida strains reveals subtle genomic differences between clinical and nonclinical isolates. Multilocus sequence analysis provides reliable species classification, highlighting the need for re-examination of current taxonomy.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Genomics
- Phylogenetics
Background:
- Pseudomonas putida is known for its degradation capabilities and has been implicated in infections, with both clinical and nonclinical isolates existing.
- Previous research has not explored the phylogenetic relationships between clinical and nonclinical P. putida isolates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the phylogenetic diversity within the Pseudomonas putida group.
- To determine the phylogenetic relationship between clinical and nonclinical P. putida isolates.
- To assess the reliability of different phylogenetic analysis methods for P. putida classification.
Main Methods:
- Phylogenetic and taxonomic analyses were performed on 59 P. putida group strains (26 clinical, 33 nonclinical).
- Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and nine housekeeping genes (argS, dnaN, dnaQ, era, gltA, gyrB, ppnK, rpoB, rpoD) was conducted.
- Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis were employed for high-resolution phylogenetic reconstruction and species delineation.
Main Results:
- 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed >97.6% similarity, insufficient for resolution.
- MLSA and ANI analyses provided high-resolution phylogenetic trees and reliable species classification.
- ANI analysis delineated 26 species, with clinical and nonclinical isolates found intermixed within clusters, indicating subtle genomic distinctions.
- The P. putida type strain NBRC 14164T was identified as a singleton, separate from other P. putida strains.
Conclusions:
- MLSA and ANI are reliable methods for P. putida phylogenetic and taxonomic studies.
- Genomic differences between clinical and nonclinical P. putida isolates are minimal.
- Current species classification and differentiation within the P. putida group require re-evaluation based on these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Bacterial Phylum Proteobacteria
Bacterial Phylum Planctomycetes
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Bacterial Phylum Tenericutes
Bacterial Phylum Bacteroidota

