Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

05:18
Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026
117
[Heart transplantation and long-term lvad support cost-effectiveness model]
Ilona Szentmihályi1, János Imre Barabás1, Ágnes Bali2
1Városmajori Szív- és Érgyógyászati Klinika, Szívsebészeti Osztály, Semmelweis Egyetem 1122 Budapest, Városmajor u. 68.
Magyar Sebeszet
|December 20, 2016
Summary
This study introduces a cost-effectiveness framework to compare heart transplantation and artificial heart devices. The model aids in strategic decision-making for advanced cardiac support funding.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Medical Technology Assessment
Background:
- Heart transplantation is a critical area at Semmelweis University, necessitating efficient funding strategies.
- Mechanical circulatory support is an increasingly important consideration alongside traditional transplantation.
- Evaluating the economic viability of different cardiac support options is crucial for resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a framework for comparing the cost-effectiveness of heart transplantation versus artificial heart implantation.
- To provide a model for analyzing the financial implications of advanced cardiac support technologies.
- To support strategic decision-making in healthcare resource allocation for cardiac procedures.
Main Methods:
- Utilized direct allocation for cost calculation.
- Incorporated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICR) for comparative analysis.
- Developed a cost-effectiveness plane to visualize the economic trade-offs.
Main Results:
- The framework allows for detailed comparison of initial, perioperative, and postoperative expenses for both heart transplantation and artificial heart groups.
- The model facilitates the assessment of cost-effectiveness across different phases of cardiac support.
- The developed methodology provides a structured approach to economic evaluation.
Conclusions:
- The proposed framework offers a robust method for comparing the cost-effectiveness of heart transplantation and artificial hearts.
- This tool can support long-term follow-up and strategic financial planning in cardiac care.
- Further patient data integration can enhance the accuracy of cost-effectiveness analyses and decision support.

