Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

From Molecules to Materials: Engineering New Ionic Liquid Crystals Through Halogen Bonding
Published on: March 24, 2018
Trends in Two- and Three-Body Effects in Multiscale Clusters of Ionic Liquids
Peter Halat1, Zoe L Seeger1, Santiago Barrera Acevedo2
1Monash Computational Chemistry Group, School of Chemistry, Monash University , 17 Rainforest Walk, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Abstract:
Applications of higher correlated levels of ab initio theory to condensed systems require a significant amount of computational resources. The recent development of the fragment molecular orbital (FMO) approach alleviates this issue by splitting the system into individual fragments and achieves the accuracy of the method by accounting for all possible two-body and three-body interactions. In this work a comprehensive application of the FMO approach in combination with a second order of Møller-Plesset perturbation theory method, MP2, is presented for multiscale clusters of ionic liquids such as [C1mim]X, [C1mpyr]X, [C2py]X, and [NMe4]X, where X = chloride and tetrafluoroborates, BF4-, with the clusters varying in size from 4, 8, 16, to 32 ion pairs. Reliable cutoff criteria for the inclusion of two-body and three-body interactions are identified for both HF energy and MP2 correlation energy to achieve the desired accuracy of 1 kJ mol-1. The importance of two-body and three-body interactions in ionic liquids is also discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge
Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
Intermolecular Forces
Ionic Association
Ionic Bonding and Electron Transfer
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

