Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient with Two-Vessel Occlusion and a Large Lambl's Excrescence
Alfredo Pizzuti1, Francesco Parisi2, Luciano Mosso3
1Division of Cardiology, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy.
Insights
Lambl's excrescence (LE), a rare aortic valve mass, was diagnosed in a patient post-myocardial infarction. Surgical excision was performed, confirming LE but indistinguishable from papillary fibroelastoma histologically.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pathology
- Surgical Medicine
Background:
- Lambl's excrescence (LE) is a rare, mobile mass on the aortic valve.
- Echocardiography is crucial for diagnosing cardiac masses.
- Embolism from cardiac masses can lead to coronary occlusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report a case of suspected Lambl's excrescence.
- To discuss the diagnostic challenges and differential diagnosis.
- To review current literature and treatment recommendations.
Main Methods:
- Echocardiography was performed to visualize the aortic valve mass.
- Surgical excision of the mass was conducted.
- Histopathological examination was used for diagnosis.
Main Results:
- A thin, mobile mass attached to the aortic valve was identified.
- Histology confirmed Lambl's excrescence.
- Histological differentiation from papillary fibroelastoma was not possible.
Conclusions:
- Lambl's excrescence diagnosis can be challenging.
- Histological similarity exists between Lambl's excrescence and papillary fibroelastoma.
- Evidence-based treatment guidelines for Lambl's excrescence are lacking.
Abstract:
A 59-year-old man underwent an echocardiography study after myocardial infarction and it showed a thin, mobile mass attached to the aortic valve. A diagnosis of Lambl's excrescence (LE) was suspected. Coronary occlusion as a consequence of embolism of LE's material could not be excluded and the patient underwent surgical excision. Histology confirmed the diagnosis; however a differential diagnosis with papillary fibroelastoma could not be established because both of these structures are histologically indistinguishable. A brief survey of the literature is presented. Evidence-based recommendations for treatment have not been established yet.
More Related Videos
05:52Myocardial Infarction by Percutaneous Embolization Coil Deployment in a Swine Model
Published on: November 4, 2021
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management