Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Incorporation of a Survivable Liver Biopsy Procedure in Mice to Assess Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis NASH Resolution
Published on: April 16, 2019
Liraglutide Versus SGLT-2 Inhibitors in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis
Maria Lorenzi1, Uffe Jon Ploug2, Jakob Langer2
1Precision Health Economics, 250-555 12 Street, Oakland, CA, 94607, USA. maria.lorenzi@precisionhealtheconomics.com.
Introduction:
For people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), evidence from both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies has demonstrated that treatment intensification with liraglutide offers effective glycemic control, weight reduction, and a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared to treatment intensification with insulin or additional OADs. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are a new class of OADs that have also been shown to be effective in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with OADs. Currently there are no head-to-head RCTs comparing these to liraglutide.
Methods:
We aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy, using network meta-analysis (NMA), of treatment intensification with liraglutide and SGLT-2 inhibitors people with T2DM who have been treated with metformin (alone or in combination with SU, DPP-4, and TZD). We performed a systematic literature review to identify relevant RCTs comparing liraglutide (1.2 and 1.8 mg), canagliflozin (100 and 300 mg), empagliflozin (10 and 25 mg), or dapagliflozin (5 and 10 mg) to placebo. To strengthen the indirect evidence base, we also included non-placebo RCTs where sitagliptin (100 mg) was the active comparator. Bayesian NMA was performed on the following outcomes to assess the relative efficacy and safety of interventions: reduction (change) in HbA1c, weight, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) as well as proportion reaching target HbA1c (<7%), and risk of hypoglycemia. Doses for each intervention were considered separately.
Results:
A total of 16 RCTs were identified. All trials were similar with respect to important baseline characteristics and study design. Both doses of liraglutide were generally statistically significantly superior to the SGLT-2s with respect to change from baseline in HbA1c and FPG as well as odds of reaching target HbA1c <7%. For weight, canagliflozin 300 mg was superior to liraglutide 1.2 mg, and SGLT-2s were generally associated with larger change from baseline in weight. For risk of major or minor hypoglycemia, no differences were found between treatments.
Conclusions:
Compared to SGLT-2 inhibitors, liraglutide offers improvement in HbA1c and FPG. Reductions in weight are likely comparable between liraglutide and SGLT-2s. Liraglutide did not differ from SGLT-2s in terms of risk of hypoglycemia. Given the lack of head-to-head evidence, this analysis provides valuable insight into the comparative outcomes of liraglutide versus SGLT-2 inhibitors.
Insights
Liraglutide improves glycemic control (HbA1c, FPG) more than SGLT-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Weight reduction is comparable, with no difference in hypoglycemia risk between these treatments.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) often requires treatment intensification beyond oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).
- Liraglutide has demonstrated efficacy in glycemic control and weight reduction.
- Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors represent a newer OAD class with proven effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the relative efficacy of liraglutide versus SGLT-2 inhibitors for T2DM treatment intensification.
- To compare glycemic control, weight changes, and hypoglycemia risk using network meta-analysis (NMA).
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of liraglutide and SGLT-2 inhibitors.
- Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) assessing changes in HbA1c, weight, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and hypoglycemia risk.
- Inclusion of trials with placebo or sitagliptin as active comparators to strengthen indirect comparisons.
Main Results:
- Liraglutide (both doses) showed statistically significant superiority over SGLT-2 inhibitors in improving HbA1c and FPG.
- SGLT-2 inhibitors, particularly canagliflozin 300 mg, were associated with greater weight reduction.
- No significant differences in the risk of major or minor hypoglycemia were observed between liraglutide and SGLT-2 inhibitors.
Conclusions:
- Liraglutide offers superior improvements in HbA1c and FPG compared to SGLT-2 inhibitors for T2DM.
- Weight reduction is comparable between liraglutide and SGLT-2 inhibitors.
- This NMA provides valuable comparative insights in the absence of head-to-head trials.
Related Concept Videos
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by...
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational

