Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments used with Pediatric Patients with Facial Differences: A

Insights

Patient-reported outcome instruments for children with facial differences often lack content validity, particularly for appearance and function. A review found most items focused on psychological impact, with negative phrasing common.

Area of Science:

  • Health outcomes research
  • Pediatric psychology
  • Dermatology and reconstructive surgery

Background:

  • Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are crucial for assessing health in pediatric populations.
  • Children and youth with conditions affecting facial appearance and function require validated PRO measures.
  • Existing PRO instruments may not adequately capture the unique experiences of this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review patient-reported outcome instruments used in research with pediatric populations experiencing facial differences.
  • To identify the specific health concepts measured by these instruments.
  • To evaluate the content validity of existing PRO instruments for this population.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) from 2004 to 2016.
  • Identified PRO instruments were analyzed using content analysis to categorize measured health concepts.
  • Items were coded for concepts and assessed for positive or negative content/phrasing.

Main Results:

  • 96 publications utilized 6 generic and 11 condition-specific PRO instruments.
  • A total of 554 items were categorized into 4 domains, 11 subdomains, and 91 health concepts.
  • The psychological domain was most represented (224 items), with 76% of items having negative content. Facial appearance (19 items) and function (22 items) were poorly represented, indicating a lack of content validity.

Conclusions:

  • Existing patient-reported outcome instruments demonstrate limited content validity for pediatric patients with facial differences, especially concerning appearance and function.
  • The majority of measured concepts focus on psychological impact, often with negative framing.
  • There is a critical need for the development of new, validated PRO instruments tailored to the specific needs of this population, such as the FACE-Q Kids instrument.
Abstract