Symptomatic carotid stenosis: is stenting as safe and effective as carotid endarterectomy?
David Calvet1, Jean-Louis Mas,
1Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris Descartes, DHU Neurovasc Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U894, Paris, France.
Insights
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are equally effective for preventing recurrent stroke. CAS has higher procedural risks but is a safe alternative for select patients, especially those under 70.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Symptomatic carotid stenosis poses a significant risk of ipsilateral stroke.
- Carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are primary interventions to prevent stroke in these patients.
- Comparative evidence between CAS and CEA is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of both procedures in preventing ipsilateral stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized clinical trials and registries.
- Analysis of individual patient data from the Carotid Stenosis Trialists' Collaboration.
Main Results:
- CAS is associated with a higher risk of procedural stroke or death compared to CEA.
- CAS shows a lower risk of procedural myocardial infarction and local complications.
- Both CAS and CEA demonstrate equal effectiveness in preventing late recurrent ipsilateral stroke.
- Restenosis rates are similarly low for both procedures.
- Individual patient data confirmed CAS safety and efficacy in patients younger than 70.
Conclusions:
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains the standard treatment for symptomatic carotid stenosis.
- Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a safe and effective alternative, particularly for patients under 70.
- CAS can be considered when CEA is contraindicated.
Purpose Of Review:
Reviewing current evidence on carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the prevention of ipsilateral stroke in patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Recent Findings:
Randomized clinical trials and registries have consistently shown that CAS is associated with a higher risk of procedural stroke or death and a lower risk of procedural myocardial infarction and local complications compared with CEA. Both procedures are equally effective to prevent late recurrent ipsilateral stroke and are associated with similar low risk of restenosis.Individual patient data analyses of the Carotid Stenosis Trialists' Collaboration recently showed that CAS is as safe and as effective in patients younger than 70.
Summary:
Although CEA remains the standard treatment in patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis, CAS is a safe and effective alternative option in patients younger than 70 and can be also considered when a contraindication to CEA exists.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management


