Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Research on Candida albicans Biofilm-Associated Prosthetic Joint Infections
Published on: February 2, 2024
Polymicrobial Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Outcome of Treatment and Identification of Risk Factors
Timothy L Tan1, Michael M Kheir, Dean D Tan
11The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Background:
The treatment outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection are frequently dependent on characteristics of the causative organism. The objective of this comparative study was to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for development of polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection, and the outcome of surgical treatment of these patients.
Methods:
All patients with polymicrobial, monomicrobial, or culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection treated from 2000 to 2014 were identified at a single institution. Ninety-five patients with a polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. We matched patients with a polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection with the other cohorts using propensity score matching for several important parameters. Treatment success was defined according to the Delphi criteria; Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were generated to demonstrate this. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for a polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection.
Results:
Overall, 10.3% (108 of 1,045) of the periprosthetic joint infections treated at our institution were polymicrobial in nature. Patients with a polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection had a higher failure rate at 50.5% (48 of 95) compared with the monomicrobial periprosthetic joint infection cohort at 31.5% (63 of 200) and the culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection cohort at 30.2% (48 of 159) (p = 0.003). The survivorship of the polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection group was 52.2% at the 2-year follow-up, 49.3% at the 5-year follow-up, and 46.8% at the 10-year follow-up. Patients with polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection had a higher rate of amputation (odds ratio [OR], 3.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34 to 10.80]), arthrodesis (OR, 11.06 [95% CI, 1.27 to 96.00]), and periprosthetic joint infection-related mortality (OR, 7.88 [95% CI, 1.60 to 38.67]) compared with patients with monomicrobial periprosthetic joint infection. Isolation of gram-negative organisms (p < 0.01), enterococci (p < 0.01), Escherichia coli (p < 0.01), and atypical organisms (p < 0.01) was associated with polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection. Only the presence of a sinus tract (OR, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.39 to 3.47]; p = 0.001) was a significant risk factor for polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions:
This study reveals that polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection, occurring at a relatively low rate, is associated with poor outcomes when compared with monomicrobial and culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection. Patients with polymicrobial infections were more likely to require a salvage procedure or to have periprosthetic joint infection-related mortality. Polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection was associated with soft-tissue defects such as a sinus tract and certain types of organisms, which should be considered when administering antibiotics to these patients.
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Insights
Polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs in 10.3% of cases and is linked to worse outcomes than single-organism or culture-negative PJIs. Patients with polymicrobial PJI face higher risks of amputation, arthrodesis, and mortality.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
Background:
- Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment success depends on causative organisms.
- Polymicrobial PJIs present unique challenges in diagnosis and management.
- Understanding risk factors and outcomes is crucial for effective PJI treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence and risk factors for polymicrobial PJI.
- To compare treatment outcomes between polymicrobial, monomicrobial, and culture-negative PJIs.
- To identify factors associated with poor outcomes in polymicrobial PJI cases.
Main Methods:
- Comparative study of patients with PJI from 2000-2014.
- Propensity score matching used to compare polymicrobial PJI patients with other cohorts.
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for polymicrobial PJI.
Main Results:
- Polymicrobial PJI accounted for 10.3% of all PJIs.
- Higher failure rates (50.5%) observed in polymicrobial PJI compared to monomicrobial (31.5%) and culture-negative (30.2%) PJIs.
- Polymicrobial PJI associated with increased rates of amputation, arthrodesis, and mortality; sinus tracts and specific organisms (Gram-negatives, enterococci, E. coli) were significant risk factors.
Conclusions:
- Polymicrobial PJI, though less common, is associated with significantly poorer surgical treatment outcomes.
- Patients with polymicrobial PJI have a higher likelihood of requiring salvage procedures or experiencing PJI-related mortality.
- Soft-tissue defects (e.g., sinus tracts) and specific microbial profiles necessitate tailored antibiotic strategies for polymicrobial PJI.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...

