Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.6K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

7.1K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.1K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.3K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.3K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.2K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.3K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.3K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

23.2K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
23.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health.

Accountability in research·2021
Same author

Census Demographics and Chlorpyrifos Use in California's Central Valley, 2011-15: A Distributional Environmental Justice Analysis.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2020
Same author

Inductive Risk, Science, and Values: A Reply to MacGillivray.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2019
Same author

Network analysis to evaluate the impact of research funding on research community consolidation.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Myles Jackson, The Genealogy of a Gene : MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2015.

Monash bioethics review·2015
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.1K

Bibliometrics for Social Validation.

Daniel J Hicks1,2

  • 1Rotman Institute of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Plos One
|December 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a new bibliometric method to measure research acceptance. High-throughput toxicology methods show strong social validation within the scientific community.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.1K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.9K

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientometrics
  • Sociology of Science

Background:

  • Assessing the social validation of novel research methods is crucial for understanding scientific progress.
  • Traditional methods for assessing social validation are often qualitative and subjective.
  • High-throughput toxicology (HTT) methods represent a significant innovation in toxicological research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a quantitative, bibliometric, citation network-based method for assessing the social validation of novel research.
  • To apply this method to evaluate the social validation of HTT methods developed at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Main Methods:

  • Bibliometric analysis using citation network data.
  • Quantitative assessment of research community connectivity and spread.
  • Application of the method to a specific case study: HTT at the EPA.

Main Results:

  • The developed bibliometric method provides a quantitative measure of social validation.
  • HTT methods at the EPA are widely disseminated across a large and interconnected research community.
  • These findings suggest a high degree of social validation for HTT methods.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed bibliometric approach offers a robust, quantitative tool for evaluating the social validation of scientific innovations.
  • The study demonstrates the significant social validation of HTT methods within the broader scientific landscape.
  • Future research can integrate mixed methods for a comprehensive assessment of social validation.