Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimizing Chromatographic Separations01:15

Optimizing Chromatographic Separations

1.1K
Optimizing chromatographic separations is crucial for obtaining clean separations in a minimum amount of time. Optimization is required for several factors, including kinetic effects related to band broadening, plate height, capacity factor, and separation factor.
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...
1.1K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Elution Process01:05

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Elution Process

1.8K
In High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), the elution process is critical to the separation of analytes and the quality of chromatographic results. Elution describes how compounds move through the column and separate based on their interactions with the mobile and stationary phases. This process determines the resolution, peak shape, and retention times in the chromatogram, which are essential for identifying and quantifying components in complex mixtures. Understanding the elution...
1.8K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction01:11

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction

3.8K
High-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC), formerly referred to as High-pressure liquid chromatography, is a powerful technique used to separate, identify, and quantify components in complex mixtures. The term "high pressure" refers to using high pressure to push the liquid mobile phase through the tightly packed columns.
In HPLC, two phases play a critical role in the separation process:
3.8K
Chromatographic Methods: Classification01:12

Chromatographic Methods: Classification

4.3K
Chromatographic techniques are classified in three ways: the classification is based on the physical state of the stationary and mobile phases, how the mobile phase and the stationary phase contact each other, or through the chemical or physical processes that isolate the components of the sample. Typically, the mobile phase is either a liquid or gas, while the stationary phase is either a solid or a liquid layer applied to a solid surface.
Chromatographic techniques are typically named by...
4.3K
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography01:18

Supercritical Fluid Chromatography

1.1K
Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) provides a beneficial substitute for gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) for certain samples because it merges the top attributes of both techniques. SFC allows the separation and analysis of compounds that GC or LC does not easily manage. These compounds are traditionally nonvolatile or thermally unstable, making GC unsuitable and lacking functional groups required for HPLC analysis.
SFC utilizes a supercritical fluid mobile phase,...
1.1K
Chromatography: Introduction01:10

Chromatography: Introduction

8.1K
Chromatography is a technique used to separate compounds based on differences of partitioning between two phases, the stationary phase and the mobile phase.
The phase in which the compounds linger or on which the compounds adsorb is called the stationary phase, whereas the mobile phase is the solvent that carries the solutes to be analyzed. In traditional column chromatography, the mixture flows through the stationary phase, and the compounds partition between the stationary and mobile phases...
8.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Second regulatory workshop on utilising in silico models to expedite vaccine development, testing, and lifecycle management - an expert meeting report.

Vaccine·2026
Same author

A Guide to Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2026
Same author

Influence of ionic liquids on enzymatic asymmetric carboligations.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2025
Same author

Measuring adsorption equilibria: The determination of the maximum binding capacity depends strongly on the method of resin preparation.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025
Same author

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) isotherm incorporating salt-dependent water activity enhances model-based analysis of protein elution profiles.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025
Same author

Advancing regulatory dialogue: In silico models for improved vaccine biomanufacturing - an expert meeting report.

Vaccine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Generic Protocol for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Production Using Automated Microbioreactor Technology
06:24

Generic Protocol for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Production Using Automated Microbioreactor Technology

Published on: December 15, 2017

10.8K

Multi-objective global optimization (MOGO): Algorithm and case study in gradient elution chromatography.

Lars Freier1, Eric von Lieres1

  • 1IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Biotechnology Journal
|December 24, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel algorithm for optimizing biotechnological separation processes by balancing conflicting targets like purity and yield. The Multi-Objective Global Optimization (MOGO) algorithm efficiently finds optimal compromises with minimal experimental effort.

Keywords:
Gaussian process regressionGradient elution chromatographyMulti-objective optimization

More Related Videos

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.6K
Automated Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Column Selection for Use in Protein Purification
10:21

Automated Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Column Selection for Use in Protein Purification

Published on: September 21, 2011

45.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Generic Protocol for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Production Using Automated Microbioreactor Technology
06:24

Generic Protocol for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Production Using Automated Microbioreactor Technology

Published on: December 15, 2017

10.8K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.6K
Automated Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Column Selection for Use in Protein Purification
10:21

Automated Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Column Selection for Use in Protein Purification

Published on: September 21, 2011

45.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology and Biochemical Engineering
  • Computational Chemistry and Modeling
  • Process Optimization

Background:

  • Biotechnological separation processes require iterative optimization using experiments and models.
  • Conflicting objectives such as productivity and yield complicate process optimization.
  • Current methods often involve serial or parallel experiments and modeling for optimization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel algorithm for multi-objective optimization in biotechnological separation processes.
  • To address the challenge of conflicting design targets like purity, yield, and processing time.
  • To demonstrate the algorithm's effectiveness in optimizing chromatographic separation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing statistical regression models, specifically Gaussian Process Regression Models (GPM), for predicting process performance.
  • Applying a Multi-Objective Global Optimization (MOGO) algorithm that combines GPM with Expected Hypervolume Improvement (EHVI).
  • Iteratively approximating the Pareto front using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to plan experiments.

Main Results:

  • The MOGO algorithm successfully optimized elution gradient and pooling strategy for a three-component system.
  • Demonstrated simultaneous optimization of purity, yield, and processing time.
  • A Monte-Carlo study confirmed the algorithm's efficiency, effectiveness, and robustness.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed MOGO algorithm provides an efficient approach for multi-objective optimization in bioseparations.
  • It enables finding optimal compromises between conflicting objectives with reduced experimental effort.
  • The algorithm is robust and effective for complex separation challenges.