Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026
Outcomes and Trends of Ventricular Assist Device Selection in Children with End-Stage Heart Failure
Jacob R Miller1, Timothy S Lancaster, Deirdre J Epstein
1From the *Section of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri; †Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri; and ‡Section of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center/LeBonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Insights
Continuous flow devices (CFD) are increasingly used over pulsatile flow devices (PFD) in pediatric heart transplant candidates. Survival outcomes were similar between CFD and PFD, despite PFD patients having higher risk factors.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Transplantation Medicine
Background:
- Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are crucial for pediatric heart failure management.
- Selection between continuous flow devices (CFD) and pulsatile flow devices (PFD) is critical for eligible pediatric patients.
- Understanding VAD trends and outcomes is essential for improving pediatric heart transplant (HT) care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in VAD selection between CFD and PFD in pediatric HT candidates.
- To compare outcomes associated with CFD versus PFD use in this population.
- To identify factors influencing device choice and their impact on patient survival.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing database.
- Inclusion of pediatric patients listed for HT between January 2007 and June 2014.
- Analysis of patients meeting size eligibility for CFD (BSA > 1.0 m²) and receiving either CFD or PFD.
Main Results:
- A significant shift towards CFD use was observed, increasing from 11% in 2007 to 88% in 2014.
- PFD recipients were younger with lower BSA and had higher rates of ECMO and biventricular assist device support.
- Survival to transplant or recovery (96% vs. 94%) and post-HT survival (95% for both) were similar between CFD and PFD groups.
Conclusions:
- Despite higher-risk profiles in PFD patients, survival rates were comparable to CFD recipients.
- There is a marked trend favoring CFD utilization in eligible pediatric patients awaiting heart transplantation.
- VAD selection strategies should consider patient characteristics and evolving device technology.
Abstract:
We aimed to examine trends in ventricular assist device (VAD) selection, continuous flow devices (CFD) versus pulsatile flow devices (PFD), and their associated outcomes in children eligible for both device types. To accomplish this, the United Network for Organ Sharing database was reviewed for pediatric patients listed for heart transplant (HT) from January 2007 to June 2014. Patients were included if a durable VAD was present at wait listing or when removed from the waiting list and who met size eligibility for a CFD (BSA > 1.0 m). In total, 253 patients met inclusion criteria, 144 (57%) CFD and 109 (43%) PFD. Device type varied significantly based on year with CFD increasing from 11% in 2007 to 88% in 2014 (p < 0.01). PFD patients were younger, had a lower BSA, and an increased rate of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and biventricular assist device support at listing. Survival to transplant or recovery was similar for CFDs and PFDs (96 vs. 94%; p = 0.57), as was the post-HT survival, 95% for both device types. Despite PFD patients having more risk factors for a poor outcome, survival was similar between device types. Even so, there is a dramatic trend toward CFD utilization in patients who are large enough to support one.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

