Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

791
Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
791
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care01:25

Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care

1.1K
Surgical management and nursing care are crucial in treating Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD). Here is an organized and enhanced overview of the surgical interventions and the associated nursing care for PUD:
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
1.1K
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management01:29

Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

698
Diagnosing and managing appendicitis requires a structured and comprehensive approach that spans from initial assessment to postoperative care. Here is an overview of the process:
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
698

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Practices in prehabilitation and follow-up after hernia surgery: a global survey of 135 surgeons from 20 countries.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Is distance a barrier to postoperative follow-up? a cox proportion analysis of geographic, financial, and clinical factors in ventral hernia repair outcomes.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2026
Same author

Risk Factors for incisional hernia development after pancreatic surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Updates in surgery·2026
Same author

Inguinal and Ventral Hernia Repair with the Hugo Robotic-Assisted Surgery System: A Prospective, Single-arm, Clinical Trial.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Optimizing pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of opioid-sparing and opioid-free analgesia in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

Updates in surgery·2026
Same author

Status of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in rural surgery: Serving a forgotten population.

Current problems in surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
05:15

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

Published on: December 23, 2022

7.6K

Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review.

Mike K Liang1, Julie L Holihan, Kamal Itani

  • 1*University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX †Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston University and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA ‡Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX §Center for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Peoria, AZ ¶University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA ||Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI **University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI ††Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR ‡‡West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV §§University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY ¶¶Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN ||||Beverly Hills Hernia Center, Beverly Hills, CA ***University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV †††George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Annals of Surgery
|December 24, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Expert consensus was reached on patient selection for ventral hernia repair (VHR), emphasizing risks in obese or smoking patients and benefits of mesh reinforcement for larger hernias. Gaps in evidence remain for complex cases.

More Related Videos

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
10:52

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh

Published on: September 11, 2021

6.0K
Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair
05:47

Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair

Published on: October 2, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
05:15

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

Published on: December 23, 2022

7.6K
Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
10:52

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh

Published on: September 11, 2021

6.0K
Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair
05:47

Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair

Published on: October 2, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Hernia Surgery
  • Surgical Best Practices
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Ventral hernia (VH) management varies widely, often lacking strong evidence.
  • Heterogeneous management patterns necessitate consensus on best practices.

Framework:

  • A systematic review identified highest-level evidence for VH management topics.
  • Expert hernia surgeons convened to discuss and vote on management strategies.
  • Consensus was defined as unanimous agreement among all participating experts.

Implementation:

  • Consensus achieved on increased risks of VH repair (VHR) complications in obese patients, current smokers, and those with HbA1C ≥ 6.5%.
  • Elective VHR discouraged for patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m², current smokers, or HbA1C ≥ 8.0%.
  • Mesh reinforcement recommended for hernias ≥ 2 cm; nonoperative management deemed low-risk for short-term morbidity.

Implications:

  • Consensus, supported by evidence, guides patient selection, nonoperative management, and mesh use in VHR.
  • Significant gaps in evidence and practice variability exist for mesh type, component separation, and complex patient management.
  • Further research is crucial to address knowledge gaps and refine VH treatment strategies.