Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Radical Reactivity: Overview01:11

Radical Reactivity: Overview

2.9K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.9K
Radical Formation: Addition00:47

Radical Formation: Addition

2.4K
Radicals can be formed by adding a radical to a spin-paired molecule. This is typically observed with unsaturated species, where the addition of a radical across the π bond leads to the production of a new radical by dissolving the π bond. For example, the addition of a Br radical to an alkene yields a carbon-centered radical.
Similar to charge conservation in chemical reactions, spin conservation is implicit for radical reactions. Accordingly, the product formed must possess an...
2.4K
Radical Formation: Overview01:03

Radical Formation: Overview

2.7K
A bond can be broken either by heterolytic bond cleavage to form ions or homolytic bond cleavage to yield radicals. A fishhook arrow is used to represent the motion of a single electron in homolytic bond cleavage. There are two main sources from which radicals can be formed:
Radicals from spin-paired molecules:
Radicals can be obtained from spin-paired molecules either by homolysis or electron transfer. While two radicals are formed in the former, an electron is added in the...
2.7K
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals01:16

Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals

2.7K
Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For...
2.7K
Radical Reactivity: Intramolecular vs Intermolecular01:33

Radical Reactivity: Intramolecular vs Intermolecular

2.3K
Radical reactions can occur either intermolecularly or intramolecularly. In an intermolecular radical reaction, a nucleophilic radical adds to an electrophilic alkene or vice versa. In such reactions, the radical and generally the alkene, which is also called the radical trap, are two different molecules. Additionally, for such intermolecular reactions to occur, the radical trap must be active, present in an excess concentration, and the radical starting material must have a weak...
2.3K
Radical Formation: Abstraction00:47

Radical Formation: Abstraction

4.4K
The electron of an atom can be abstracted from a compound by a relatively unstable radical to generate a new radical of relatively greater stability. For example, an initiator which forms radicals by homolysis can abstract a suitable species like a hydrogen atom or a halogen atom from a compound to generate a new radical. This ability of radicals to propagate by abstraction is a crucial feature of radical chain reactions.
Even though homolysis produces radicals, it is different from radical...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Solvent effects on triplet yields in BODIPY-based photosensitizers.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Two-dimensional electronic spectra from trajectory-based dynamics: Pure-state Ehrenfest, spin-mapping, and mean classical path approaches.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Analytic Gradients and Periodic Boundary Conditions for Direct Reaction Field Polarizable QM/MM with Electrostatic Potential Fitting.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Enantioselective Radical Reactions Can Be Induced by Electron Spin Polarization: A Quantum Mechanism for Nature's Emergent Homochirality?

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2025
Same author

Correction: Exciton dynamics from the mapping approach to surface hopping: comparison with Förster and Redfield theories.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2025
Same author

Nuclear quantum effects slow down the energy transfer in biological light-harvesting complexes.

Science advances·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Exploring the Radical Nature of a Carbon Surface by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and a Calibrated Gas Flow
10:34

Exploring the Radical Nature of a Carbon Surface by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and a Calibrated Gas Flow

Published on: April 24, 2014

11.3K

An efficient quantum mechanical method for radical pair recombination reactions.

Alan M Lewis1, Thomas P Fay1, David E Manolopoulos1

  • 1Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|December 25, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new stochastic method significantly speeds up quantum mechanical simulations for radical pair recombination reactions. This approach accelerates calculations by over 5000 times, facilitating studies in chemistry and biology.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization
08:22

Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization

Published on: August 6, 2018

7.4K
Isolating Free Carbenes, their Mixed Dimers and Organic Radicals
10:44

Isolating Free Carbenes, their Mixed Dimers and Organic Radicals

Published on: April 19, 2019

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Exploring the Radical Nature of a Carbon Surface by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and a Calibrated Gas Flow
10:34

Exploring the Radical Nature of a Carbon Surface by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and a Calibrated Gas Flow

Published on: April 24, 2014

11.3K
Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization
08:22

Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization

Published on: August 6, 2018

7.4K
Isolating Free Carbenes, their Mixed Dimers and Organic Radicals
10:44

Isolating Free Carbenes, their Mixed Dimers and Organic Radicals

Published on: April 19, 2019

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Chemical physics
  • Computational chemistry

Background:

  • Radical pair recombination reactions are crucial in chemistry and biology.
  • Standard quantum mechanical simulations involve complex calculations over electronic and nuclear spin states.
  • Current deterministic methods face significant computational challenges due to the large number of nuclear spin states.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more efficient computational method for simulating radical pair recombination reactions.
  • To reduce the computational cost associated with quantum mechanical calculations of spin dynamics.
  • To enable accurate simulations for complex radical pair systems.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a stochastic approach utilizing spin coherent states to evaluate traces over spin Hilbert spaces.
  • Implemented a Monte Carlo sampling technique for convergence.
  • Performed calculations on a strongly coupled radical pair with over 10^6 nuclear spin states.

Main Results:

  • The stochastic method reduces computational effort from O(Z^2 log Z) to O(MZ log Z).
  • Achieved convergence to graphical accuracy with only 200 Monte Carlo samples (M=200).
  • Demonstrated a speed-up factor exceeding 5000 compared to standard deterministic calculations.

Conclusions:

  • The stochastic method offers a highly efficient alternative for quantum mechanical simulations of radical pair spin dynamics.
  • This advancement will greatly facilitate future research on radical pairs in various chemical and biological processes.
  • The method is particularly effective for systems with a large number of nuclear spin states.