Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
Splendor and misery of adaptation, or the importance of neutral null for understanding evolution
1National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA. koonin@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Abstract:
The study of any biological features, including genomic sequences, typically revolves around the question: what is this for? However, population genetic theory, combined with the data of comparative genomics, clearly indicates that such a "pan-adaptationist" approach is a fallacy. The proper question is: how has this sequence evolved? And the proper null hypothesis posits that it is a result of neutral evolution: that is, it survives by sheer chance provided that it is not deleterious enough to be efficiently purged by purifying selection. To claim adaptation, the neutral null has to be falsified. The adaptationist fallacy can be costly, inducing biologists to relentlessly seek function where there is none.
Related Concept Videos
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
The Evidence for Evolution
Evolutionary Psychology
What is Natural Selection?
Limits to Natural Selection

