Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Rate

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...

Censoring Survival Data

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

Introduction To Survival Analysis

Introduction To Survival Analysis

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Differential Cantilever Enhanced Fiber-Optic Photoacoustic Sensor for Diffusion Gas Detection.

Analytical chemistry·2024

Same author

Long-cycling and High-voltage Solid State Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by Fluorinated and Crosslinked Polyether Electrolytes.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2024

Same author

Succulent-Inspired Implicit Structural Change for Smart "ON/OFF" Switchable and Flexible EMI Shielding Coating.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2024

Same author

Global research on RNA vaccines for COVID-19 from 2019 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.

Frontiers in immunology·2024

Same author

Macular Neural and Microvascular Alterations in Type 2 Diabetes Without Retinopathy: A SS-OCT Study.

American journal of ophthalmology·2024

Same author

Tumor characteristics, brain functional activity, and connectivity of tinnitus in patients with vestibular schwannoma: a pilot study.

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Cause-Specific Hazard Regression for Competing Risks Data Under Interval Censoring and Left Truncation.

¹Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, U.S.A.

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis

|December 27, 2016

Summary

This study introduces a new statistical method for analyzing competing risks data, essential for understanding diseases like dementia. The approach accurately estimates risks and identifies factors influencing outcomes in studies with interval censoring and left truncation.

Keywords:

Cause-specific hazard Competing risks Interval censoring Left truncation Penalized likelihood Smoothing parameter selection

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Survival Analysis

Background:

Analyzing competing risks data, especially with interval censoring and left truncation, is statistically challenging and understudied.
Understanding the causes of death or disease progression requires accurate estimation of cause-specific hazards.
Existing methods may not adequately address the complexities of interval-censored and left-truncated data in competing risks scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a statistical approach for inferring cause-specific hazards from competing risks data with interval censoring and left truncation.
To assess the performance of the proposed method using Monte Carlo simulations.
To demonstrate the practical application of the method in a real-world longitudinal dementia study.

Main Methods:

A penalized likelihood approach was developed for a Cox-type proportional cause-specific hazards model.
Asymptotic theory for the proposed statistical model was derived and discussed.
Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate the method's performance with moderate sample sizes.

Main Results:

The penalized likelihood approach demonstrated strong performance for estimating cause-specific hazards in simulated data.
The method effectively handled interval censoring and left truncation in competing risks settings.
Application to a dementia study successfully estimated age-specific hazards for Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, and death without dementia.

Conclusions:

The developed penalized likelihood method provides a robust tool for analyzing complex competing risks data.
The approach is practically useful for epidemiological studies, particularly in aging and dementia research.
The study successfully identified risk factors associated with competing risks in the dementia cohort.