Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

7.2K
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
7.2K
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality01:19

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

911
Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished.
911
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

5.0K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
5.0K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.7K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.7K
What is Behavior?00:54

What is Behavior?

10.4K
Behaviors are actions that an organism engages in—they can be related to finding food, reproducing, defending against threats, and many other possible actions. Behaviors include activities related to the environment around the animal—such as migration—as well as social interactions within a species or population. Many behaviors involve motor output—that is, muscle movements—while others involve less visible actions, such as learning.
10.4K
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

14.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
14.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Role of Theory in Behavior Analysis: A Response to <i>Unfinished Business</i>, Travis Thompson's Review of Staddon's <i>New Behaviorism</i> (2<sup>nd</sup> edition).

The Psychological record·2020
Same author

Simply Too Many Notes.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same author

Rapid, accurate time estimation in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Behavioural processes·2013
Same author

Up close: Impersonal.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Editorial: choice studies in transition.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2011
Same author

The dynamics of successive induction in larval zebrafish.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2011
Same journal

An Internal and Critical Review of the PEAK Relational Training System for Children with Autism and Related Intellectual Disabilities: 2014-2017.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

Self-Control Based on Soft Commitment.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

Behavioral Pragmatism: Making A Place for Reality and Truth.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

The Challenges of Integrating Behavioral and Neural Data: Bridging and Breaking Boundaries Across Levels of Analysis.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

The Future of Behavior Analysis: Foxes and Hedgehogs Revisited.

The Behavior analyst·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.3K

Faith, Fact, and Behaviorism.

J E R Staddon

    The Behavior Analyst
    |December 27, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Scientific knowledge alone cannot motivate action, as David Hume

    Keywords:
    E. O. WilsonRichard Dawkinsevolutionreligionscience

    More Related Videos

    Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
    08:43

    Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

    Published on: August 29, 2016

    11.0K
    Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
    06:57

    Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

    Published on: February 4, 2016

    11.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
    06:42

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

    Published on: September 28, 2018

    12.3K
    Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
    08:43

    Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

    Published on: August 29, 2016

    11.0K
    Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
    06:57

    Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

    Published on: February 4, 2016

    11.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Philosophy of Science
    • Ethics
    • Epistemology

    Background:

    • David Hume's philosophical argument posits that factual statements ('is') cannot logically lead to prescriptive statements ('ought').
    • Modern scientific endeavors, particularly in secular contexts, appear to overlook this fundamental distinction.
    • Motivated human action inherently relies on foundational beliefs that lie beyond empirical verification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-examine David Hume's is-ought problem in the context of contemporary scientific motivation.
    • To highlight the role of non-provable beliefs (faith) in driving human action, despite scientific advancements.
    • To underscore the limitations of purely scientific knowledge in dictating ethical or motivational imperatives.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of Hume's arguments.
    • Review of the relationship between scientific findings and human motivation.
    • Epistemological examination of belief systems underpinning action.

    Main Results:

    • Scientific facts alone are insufficient to compel action or establish moral obligations.
    • Underlying all motivated action are beliefs that are not scientifically demonstrable.
    • The is-ought gap remains a critical consideration in understanding human behavior and scientific influence.

    Conclusions:

    • Human action is fundamentally driven by a combination of factual beliefs and non-empirical faith.
    • Science, while powerful, cannot solely provide the basis for 'ought' statements or motivate action without recourse to faith.
    • Revisiting Hume's insights is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between knowledge, belief, and action.