Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Physiology of Taste01:24

The Physiology of Taste

8.1K
The perception of a salty flavor is facilitated by sodium ions within the oral salivary fluid. Upon consumption of a salty substance, salt crystals disassemble, leading to the liberation of its constituents—Na+ and Cl- ions. These ions subsequently dissolve into the salivary fluid present in the oral cavity. The external environment of the gustatory cells experiences an elevation in Na+ concentration, thereby establishing a potent concentration gradient. This gradient propels the...
8.1K
Taste Buds and Receptors01:20

Taste Buds and Receptors

5.6K
Gustation, or the sense of taste, is intrinsically linked to the anatomical structures located on the tongue. This organ's surface, along with the entirety of the oral cavity, is adorned with stratified squamous epithelium. Evident on the tongue are elevated structures known as papillae (singular = papilla), which house the mechanisms for the transduction of gustatory stimuli. Four distinct types of papillae exist, each identified by their unique morphological attributes: the circumvallate,...
5.6K
Gustation01:43

Gustation

53.0K
Gustation is a chemical sense that, along with olfaction (smell), contributes to our perception of taste. It starts with the activation of receptors by chemical compounds (tastants) dissolved in the saliva. The saliva and filiform papillae on the tongue distribute the tastants and increase their exposure to the taste receptors.
53.0K
Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

4.9K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A microrheological examination of insulin-secreting β-cells in healthy and diabetic-like conditions.

Soft matter·2024
Same author

A bending fluctuation-based mechanism for particle detection by ciliated structures.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same author

Food structure and functionality: a soft matter perspective.

Soft matter·2020
Same author

Collective stiffening of soft hair assemblies.

Physical review. E·2020
Same author

Probing in-mouth texture perception with a biomimetic tongue.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2019
Same author

Differing structural properties of foods affect the development of mandibular control and muscle coordination in infants and young children.

Physiology & behavior·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding
10:59

New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding

Published on: June 29, 2017

10.1K

Frequency-Amplitude Cross Interaction during Pulsatile Taste Delivery Using Gustometers.

Jean-Baptiste Thomazo1, Adam Burbidge1, Benjamin Le Révérend1

  • 1Taste and Behavior Science, Nestlé Research Center Lausanne, Switzerland.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|December 27, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Understanding Taylor dispersion in gustometer experiments is crucial. A dimensionless frequency parameter predicts if pulse concentration profiles will match intended delivery, preventing experimental errors.

Keywords:
gustometermixingpulsatile deliverytastetransient perception

More Related Videos

µTongue: A Microfluidics-Based Functional Imaging Platform for the Tongue In Vivo
07:53

µTongue: A Microfluidics-Based Functional Imaging Platform for the Tongue In Vivo

Published on: April 22, 2021

5.0K
In vivo Calcium Imaging of Mouse Geniculate Ganglion Neuron Responses to Taste Stimuli
07:27

In vivo Calcium Imaging of Mouse Geniculate Ganglion Neuron Responses to Taste Stimuli

Published on: February 11, 2021

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding
10:59

New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding

Published on: June 29, 2017

10.1K
µTongue: A Microfluidics-Based Functional Imaging Platform for the Tongue In Vivo
07:53

µTongue: A Microfluidics-Based Functional Imaging Platform for the Tongue In Vivo

Published on: April 22, 2021

5.0K
In vivo Calcium Imaging of Mouse Geniculate Ganglion Neuron Responses to Taste Stimuli
07:27

In vivo Calcium Imaging of Mouse Geniculate Ganglion Neuron Responses to Taste Stimuli

Published on: February 11, 2021

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Fluid dynamics
  • Sensory science
  • Experimental design

Background:

  • Gustometer experiments often involve delivering pulsed concentrations of tastants.
  • Taylor dispersion is a key phenomenon affecting concentration profiles in such setups.
  • Accurate delivery of concentration profiles is vital for reliable sensory assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To numerically model tastant concentration flow profiles in a gustometer.
  • To identify conditions where delivered concentration profiles deviate from intended profiles.
  • To introduce a design criterion for optimizing gustometer experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Numerical resolution of flow profiles for tastant concentration.
  • Analysis of Taylor dispersion in a pipe flow setup.
  • Development and application of a dimensionless frequency parameter.

Main Results:

  • The study defines conditions leading to significant deviations between intended and delivered concentration profiles.
  • A dimensionless frequency parameter, dependent on pulse frequency, pipe dimensions, and flow rate, was identified.
  • Pulse frequency modifications alter pulse amplitude if this parameter is not considered.

Conclusions:

  • The dimensionless frequency is a critical, yet overlooked, parameter for gustometer experimental design.
  • This parameter allows a priori assessment of concentration profile accuracy.
  • Incorporating this criterion can improve the reliability and reproducibility of sensory experiments.