Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

842
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
842
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.5K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.5K
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.7K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.7K
Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

1.8K
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
1.8K
Vision01:24

Vision

60.9K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
60.9K
Visual System01:26

Visual System

2.2K
Light enters the eye through the cornea, a transparent, dome-shaped surface covering the surface of the eyeball that helps to direct and focus incoming light. This light is then channeled toward the pupil, an adjustable opening whose size is controlled by the iris. The iris, a pigmented muscle, regulates the amount of light entering the eye by contracting or dilating the pupil, thereby ensuring optimal light levels for clear vision.
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human vision maintains a rich representation of objects moving behind an occluder.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Multisensory Number Channels Derived from Individual Differences.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Correction: Quantum spin models for numerosity perception.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Reply to: Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Color crowding considered as adaptive spatial integration.

Journal of vision·2024
Same author

Editorial: Signatures of a direct sense of number.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same journal

The default mode network: where spontaneous thought meets memory consolidation.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2026
Same journal

Brain activity is not only for thinking.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2026
Same journal

Role of striatal dopamine signaling in compulsive eating associated with obesity.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescales of dopamine release in the striatum as a window into hierarchical control.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2026
Same journal

Contributions of default mode network to subjective valuation and maladaptive decision making.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2026
Same journal

Evolution of neural circuits in the origin of behavioral novelty.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.8K

Multiple channels of visual time perception.

Aurelio Bruno1, Guido Marco Cicchini2

  • 1Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, 16, London WC1H 0AP, UK.

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
|December 27, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual time perception may involve multiple, specialized brain mechanisms, challenging the idea of a single time clock. This challenges traditional views by linking time processing to sensory and spatial elements.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The classical view posits a single, supramodal clock for time perception.
  • Traditional assumptions suggest time perception is independent of sensory input and spatial processing.
  • Recent research indicates a more complex, distributed system for timing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence for distributed, vision-specific, and timescale-specific mechanisms in visual time processing.
  • To contrast these findings with the classical single-clock model of time perception.
  • To explore the implications of sensory-specific timing mechanisms and their relationship with space.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing neuroscientific and psychological literature.
  • Analysis of studies investigating visual timing mechanisms.
  • Synthesis of evidence from sensory adaptation and neural imaging studies.

Main Results:

  • Evidence supports a network of distributed mechanisms for visual time processing.
  • Some timing mechanisms exhibit sensory specificity and local adaptability, linking time to sensory experience.
  • These findings challenge the notion of a supramodal, spatially independent time perception system.

Conclusions:

  • Visual time perception is likely subserved by multiple, interacting neural mechanisms.
  • These mechanisms are specialized for vision and specific timescales.
  • Time perception is not entirely divorced from sensory and spatial processing, necessitating revised models.