Trends in U.S. Cardiovascular Care: 2016 Report From 4 ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registries

Frederick A Masoudi1, Angelo Ponirakis2, James A de Lemos3

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium, Denver, Colorado.

Insights

Data from 2014 reveals patient and center characteristics across four National Cardiovascular Data Registry programs, offering insights into cardiovascular disease care quality. These registries track procedures like percutaneous coronary intervention and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for improved patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Public Health
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a primary cause of mortality and morbidity in the U.S.
  • National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) programs are crucial for evaluating care quality and patient outcomes in CVD.
  • This report focuses on 2014 data from four key NCDR hospital quality programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present demographic and clinical profiles of patients within major NCDR registries.
  • To describe characteristics of healthcare centers participating in these quality programs.
  • To provide an overview of selected process and outcome measures for cardiovascular care.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 2014 data from four NCDR programs: CathPCI, ICD Registry, ACTION-GWTG, and IMPACT.
  • Data includes procedural volumes, patient numbers, and participating hospital counts for each program.
  • Characterization of patient demographics, clinical status, and center-specific data.

Main Results:

  • CathPCI: 667,424 procedures across 1,612 hospitals.
  • ICD Registry: 158,649 procedures across 1,715 hospitals.
  • ACTION-GWTG: 182,903 patients across 907 hospitals.
  • IMPACT: 20,169 procedures across 76 hospitals.
  • The report details patient and center characteristics and care quality metrics for these diverse cardiovascular interventions.

Conclusions:

  • The NCDR programs provide valuable, large-scale data on cardiovascular disease care in the U.S.
  • Understanding patient and center characteristics is essential for targeted quality improvement initiatives.
  • This data serves as a benchmark for assessing and enhancing cardiovascular care delivery.

Related Concept Videos