Is Histopathological Analysis of Interdigital Morton's Neuroma Necessary?

Ravi Kanth Mallina1, Khalid Al-Dadah1, Kirtan Patel1

  • 1Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Foot & Ankle Specialist
|December 30, 2016
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Routine histopathological analysis of Morton's neuroma (interdigital neuroma) following surgical excision is not necessary. Clinical and radiological diagnoses consistently align with histopathology, suggesting a cost-saving approach by reserving analysis for ambiguous cases.

Area of Science:

  • Podiatric Surgery
  • Orthopedic Pathology

Background:

  • Interdigital neuroma (Morton's neuroma) is a frequent cause of metatarsalgia.
  • Surgical excision is the gold standard for refractory cases.
  • Pathological analysis is recommended by some institutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To correlate clinical and radiological diagnoses with histopathological findings of resected Morton's neuromas.
  • To evaluate the necessity of routine histopathological analysis post-surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective single-center study of 96 surgical records (January 2007-July 2016).
  • Analysis of histopathology results for 85 patients with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of interdigital neuroma.
  • Level IV evidence: Case series.

Main Results:

  • 100% concordance between clinical, radiographic, and intraoperative diagnosis and histopathological confirmation of Morton's neuroma.
  • No discrepancies were found in the analyzed cohort.

Conclusions:

  • Histopathological diagnosis perfectly matched clinical and radiological assessments in this series.
  • Routine histopathological analysis of Morton's neuroma is deemed unnecessary, offering resource and cost benefits.
  • Histopathology should be reserved for cases with intraoperative diagnostic uncertainty.

Related Concept Videos