Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Making literature reviews more ethical: a researcher and health sciences librarian collaborative process
Bejoy Thomas1, Admasu Tachble2, Delshani Peiris2
1Department of Psychosocial & Rehabilitation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, CancerContol Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, T2S 3CI, Canada; Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada; Department of Psychosocial & Rehabilitation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, CancerContol Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, T2S 3CI, Canada; Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Background:
With emphasis on evidence-based medical care, 'evidence' is often the result of literature reviews. Hence, the critical question, "are literature reviews comprehensive?"
Aim:
This study compares the literature generated by a researcher and a health sciences librarian (HSL).
Methods:
The Research Associate and the HSL conducted a parallel, segregated literature search on 'patient-centered care'.
Results:
The Research Associate identified 215 manuscripts, and the HSL 129 manuscripts. Overlap was only 55 manuscripts. Differences in process and blind spots are discussed.
Conclusion:
To improve the quality of research outcomes, it seems prudent and ethical to have a synergistic collaboration between researchers and HSLs. Given that this is just one case study that has looked into the issue, further research is strongly encouraged.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Health Literacy
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:11Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
01:56Ethics in Research
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
01:22Ethics and Bioethics