Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
Published on: April 12, 2019
Elucidating the H-Bonding Environment of Coumarin 102 in a Phenol-Cyclohexane Mixture by Molecular Dynamics
Tousif Hossen1, Kalyanasis Sahu1
1Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati , Guwahati 781039, Assam, India.
Abstract:
Recently, we have experimentally demonstrated that the fluorescence intensity of coumarin 102 (C102) modulates anomalously upon hydrogen bonding to phenol in a nonpolar solvent: cyclohexane. The fluorescence intensity is first quenched gradually up to a particular mole fraction (XPH ≈ 0.013) but thereafter increases with further increases in the phenol mole fraction. These studies speculate about the importance of C102-phenol H-bonding to induce photoinduced electron transfer (PET) and propose a competition between the C102-phenol and phenol-phenol H-bonding to account for the anomalous fluorescence modulation. In this work, we investigate the exact H-bonding environment around the acceptor C102 at various compositions by molecular dynamics simulation and correlate the H-bonding environment to the observed fluorescence quenching. In addition to the 1:1 C102-phenol complex, 1:2 C102-(phenol)2 complexes with two different types of geometries were also found. Furthermore, density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations were carried out to understand the H-bonding in these complexes in the ground state and in the excited state and their possible contribution to the observed fluorescence quenching.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
05:51Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method
Published on: July 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Benzene to Phenol via Cumene: Hock Process
Hydrogen Bonds
Hydrogen Bonds Control the World!
Because hydrogen has very weak electronegativity when it binds with a strongly electronegative atom, such as oxygen or nitrogen, electrons in the bond are unequally shared....