Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

An Adoptive Transfer Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Mice
Published on: June 6, 2025
Biological Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Link Between Immune Tolerance and Immune Surveillance
Rossella Talotta1, Fabiola Atzeni1, Alberto Batticciotto1
1Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Abstract:
The biological drugs have all been successfully used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and have led to fair rates of clinical remission; however, the possible occurrence of adverse events such as infectious diseases or cancers means that the patients undergoing treatment need to be closely monitored. Anti-TNF agents, first appeared in the pharmacological algorithm of RA in the early 2000s, seem to lead to a higher risk of reactivated tubercular infection than the biological agents with different mechanism of action (abatacept or rituximab). Although the data on anti-TNF agents and cancer are controversial, their use is currently not recommended in neoplastic patients because of their uncertain effects on immune-surveillance. The safety profile of abatacept is similar to that of other biological agents, while rituximab is used to treat non-Hodgkin lymphomas and is also considered in the case of RA patients with previous hematological or non-hematological malignancies. The risk of infections and new-onset cancers during tocilizumab treatment is similar to that associated with other biological therapies. Finally, under particular circumstances, such as in the presence of infections or malignancies, blocking a specific immunological pathway may be simultaneously successful and detrimental. The only thing that can be done at the moment is to continue to look for adverse events in order to discover these complications as soon as possible, and then develop the most appropriate means of treating (and even preventing) them.
Insights
Biological drugs effectively treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but require monitoring for adverse events like infections and cancers. Anti-TNF agents may increase TB reactivation risk, while abatacept and rituximab have different safety profiles in cancer patients.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Rheumatology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Biological drugs, including anti-TNF agents, abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab, are established treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- While effective in achieving clinical remission, these therapies carry risks of adverse events, necessitating careful patient monitoring.
- Specific concerns include infectious diseases and secondary malignancies, impacting treatment decisions, particularly in vulnerable patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the safety profiles of various biological agents used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment.
- To compare the risks of adverse events, such as infections and cancers, associated with different classes of biological therapies.
- To discuss the implications of these safety concerns for clinical practice, especially in patients with a history of or predisposition to malignancies.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and synthesis of existing data on biological therapies for RA.
- Comparative analysis of adverse event profiles, focusing on infections (e.g., tuberculosis reactivation) and cancer risks.
- Evaluation of specific drug classes: anti-TNF agents, abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab.
Main Results:
- Anti-TNF agents may be associated with a higher risk of tuberculosis reactivation compared to other biologics.
- Data on anti-TNF agents and cancer risk remain controversial; their use is cautioned in patients with cancer due to immune-surveillance concerns.
- Abatacept shows a comparable safety profile to other biologics, while rituximab is used in lymphoma patients and considered for RA patients with prior malignancies.
- Tocilizumab carries risks of infection and new-onset cancer similar to other biological therapies.
Conclusions:
- The use of biological agents in RA requires vigilant monitoring for adverse events, including infections and malignancies.
- The choice of biological therapy should consider the patient's individual risk factors, particularly a history of infections or cancer.
- Ongoing research is crucial for better understanding and managing these potential complications, aiming for improved patient outcomes and safety.
More Related Videos
11:03A Cryo-pulverization Protocol for Processing Mouse Paws to Evaluate Molecular Pathways of Tissue Inflammation in a Collagen Induced Arthritis Model
Published on: October 30, 2019
04:50Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Related Concept Videos
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
Autoimmune Disorders
Concept and Mechanism of Autoimmune Diseases
The immune...
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Special Features of Adaptive Immunity
The primary cell types involved in adaptive immunity are T cells and B cells. Each type has a unique role in defending the body against pathogens. T cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity. They identify and eliminate infected cells directly,...