Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anaesthesia for day case oral surgery.

K J Power1

  • 1Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath.

The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
|October 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

This study compared two anesthetic techniques for outpatient wisdom tooth extraction. Both methods showed similar recovery and morbidity, with high patient acceptance, suggesting cost-saving potential for day surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interpreting the base deficit.

Anaesthesia·2000
Same author

The legal and ethical implications of consent to nursing procedures.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·1997
Same author

Pre-registration house surgeons. A questionnaire study of anaesthesia-related knowledge and approach to pre-operative investigations.

Anaesthesia·1992
Same author

Foam cuffed tracheal tubes: clinical and laboratory assessment.

British journal of anaesthesia·1990
Same author

Does xenon deserve a prominent place in anaesthetic practice?

Anaesthesia·1990
Same author

Postpartum thrombosis of the great vein of Galen.

Anaesthesia·1990

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Anesthesiology
  • Outpatient Surgery

Background:

  • Wisdom tooth extraction is commonly performed, with evolving anesthetic techniques influencing patient recovery and morbidity.
  • Outpatient procedures offer economic benefits but require careful anesthetic management for patient safety and satisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the quality of recovery and extent of morbidity between two anesthetic techniques for outpatient wisdom tooth extraction.
  • To evaluate patient acceptability and identify potential adverse events associated with each technique.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study evaluating two propofol-based anesthetic techniques (spontaneous respiration vs. mechanical ventilation) for outpatient wisdom tooth extraction.
  • Objective recovery tests and assessment of morbidity symptoms were conducted postoperatively.
  • Patient acceptability was gauged through direct feedback.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in objective recovery parameters were observed between the two anesthetic groups at 30 and 60 minutes postoperatively.
  • Morbidity incidence was similar, with severe muscle pain noted in 16% of patients receiving suxamethonium.
  • Overall patient acceptability was high, with 80% satisfaction reported in both groups.

Conclusions:

  • Both anesthetic techniques are suitable for outpatient wisdom tooth extraction, demonstrating comparable recovery and low morbidity.
  • Improvements in anesthetic agents support the shift of more patients from inpatient to outpatient settings, yielding economic advantages.
  • Careful agent selection, avoiding suxamethonium when possible, can further minimize adverse events like muscle pain.

Related Experiment Videos