Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Analyzing Long-Term Electrocardiography Recordings to Detect Arrhythmias in Mice
Published on: May 23, 2021
CSE database: extended annotations and new recommendations for ECG software testing
Radovan Smíšek1, Lucie Maršánová2, Andrea Němcová2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, 61600, Brno, Czech Republic. xsmise00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz.
Insights
This study enhanced the Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography (CSE) database with new diagnoses and established quality estimation recommendations for electrocardiography (ECG) diagnostic software. This facilitates objective algorithm evaluation and faster cardiovascular disease diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology and Medical Informatics
- Development of diagnostic algorithms for cardiovascular diseases
- Standardization of medical databases for algorithm testing
Background:
- Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of death, necessitating accurate diagnostic tools.
- Electrocardiography (ECG) is a crucial diagnostic technique for cardiovascular disorders.
- Automatic diagnostic algorithms require standardized, annotated databases for reliable comparison and development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance the Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography (CSE) database with extended annotations.
- To establish new recommendations for the quality estimation of diagnostic software.
- To provide a benchmark for evaluating the accuracy of ECG classification algorithms.
Main Methods:
- Independent diagnosis of ECG recordings by five cardiologists.
- Establishment of a four-round consensus (4R consensus) diagnosis.
- Calculation of accuracy metrics including sensitivity, positive predictive value, and Jaccard coefficient.
Main Results:
- Extended the CSE database with 59 unique diagnoses, significantly increasing its annotation richness.
- Established accuracy ranges (sensitivity: 79.20-86.81%, PPV: 79.10-87.11%, Jaccard: 72.21-81.14%) for software comparability with cardiologists.
- Quantified the accuracy of diagnostic software against a consensus diagnosis, offering a unique evaluation method.
Conclusions:
- The enhanced CSE database and proposed recommendations facilitate objective evaluation and development of ECG diagnostic software.
- Software accuracy within the established ranges is comparable to that of expert cardiologists.
- This work aims to accelerate the development and testing of classification software, ultimately improving patient diagnosis and treatment timelines.
Abstract:
Nowadays, cardiovascular diseases represent the most common cause of death in western countries. Among various examination techniques, electrocardiography (ECG) is still a highly valuable tool used for the diagnosis of many cardiovascular disorders. In order to diagnose a person based on ECG, cardiologists can use automatic diagnostic algorithms. Research in this area is still necessary. In order to compare various algorithms correctly, it is necessary to test them on standard annotated databases, such as the Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography (CSE) database. According to Scopus, the CSE database is the second most cited standard database. There were two main objectives in this work. First, new diagnoses were added to the CSE database, which extended its original annotations. Second, new recommendations for diagnostic software quality estimation were established. The ECG recordings were diagnosed by five new cardiologists independently, and in total, 59 different diagnoses were found. Such a large number of diagnoses is unique, even in terms of standard databases. Based on the cardiologists' diagnoses, a four-round consensus (4R consensus) was established. Such a 4R consensus means a correct final diagnosis, which should ideally be the output of any tested classification software. The accuracy of the cardiologists' diagnoses compared with the 4R consensus was the basis for the establishment of accuracy recommendations. The accuracy was determined in terms of sensitivity = 79.20-86.81%, positive predictive value = 79.10-87.11%, and the Jaccard coefficient = 72.21-81.14%, respectively. Within these ranges, the accuracy of the software is comparable with the accuracy of cardiologists. The accuracy quantification of the correct classification is unique. Diagnostic software developers can objectively evaluate the success of their algorithm and promote its further development. The annotations and recommendations proposed in this work will allow for faster development and testing of classification software. As a result, this might facilitate cardiologists' work and lead to faster diagnoses and earlier treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...
Electrocardiogram Fundamentals
An electrocardiogram (ECG) is a diagnostic tool for identifying cardiac conditions such as arrhythmias, conduction abnormalities, and myocardial ischemia.
Definition
An electrocardiogram (ECG) visualizes the heart's electrical activity by tracing the electrical movement associated with each heartbeat on a graph or monitor. As the heart beats, an electrical wave passes through it, correlating with the cardiac cycle events.
Parts of an ECG
An ECG utilizes electrodes on the skin...
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Instrumentation Amplifier
To overcome this challenge, an ECG machine utilizes an instrumentation amplifier. This specialized amplifier is...
ECG Interpretation of Rhythms
Components of the Electrocardiogram
The primary components of a normal ECG waveform in Normal sinus rhythm(NSR) include the P wave, PR interval, QRS complex, ST segment, T wave, and occasionally a U wave.
ECG waveforms are divided by vertical and horizontal lines at standard intervals.
The horizontal axis measures time and rate, and the vertical axis measures amplitude or voltage....
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring

