Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Maximum Size of Aggregate01:12

Maximum Size of Aggregate

624
The maximum size of aggregate is defined as the aperture of the sieve retaining 15 percent or more of the particles present in the aggregate sample. The aggregate's maximum size impacts the concrete's water requirement, workability, and strength. Larger aggregates reduce the surface area needing cement paste coverage, which can lower water needs, thereby allowing a decrease in the water-to-cement ratio when the desired workability and richness of the mix are to be maintained, which can...
624
Design Example: Aggregate Gradation01:24

Design Example: Aggregate Gradation

355
The right type and quality of aggregates are crucial for concrete as they significantly influence its properties, mix proportions, and cost-effectiveness. If different sources are available for sand, the commonly used fine aggregate in concrete, the selection of sand is primarily based on its gradation.
The grading, or particle-size distribution, of sand is determined using sieve analysis, with standard sizes ranging from 150 μm to 10 mm (ASTM No. 100 sieve to 3⁄8 in. sieve). Sand is...
355
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

16.8K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
16.8K
Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves01:19

Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves

1.1K
Sieve analysis is a method used to determine the particle size distribution of aggregate materials. This process involves the following steps:
1.1K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

530
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
530

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Impact of mental health on outcomes of patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy·2026
Same author

Common food allergen education and exposure in infants with feeding tubes: A single-center retrospective study highlighting an educational gap.

Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition·2026
Same author

Linking Minimally Important Differences (MID) and Acceptable Regret to Elicit Values and Preferences in Health Decision Models.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

Successful Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis with Dupilumab in Patients Under 1 Year of Age or Less Than 15 Kg: A Retrospective Chart-Review of Ten Patients.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2026
Same author

Increased Risk of Heart Rhythm Abnormalities in Adolescents and Young Adults Who Vape.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Pacemaker Status and 5-Year Mortality After TAVI: A Sex-Specific Analysis.

European journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects of Time-Varying Treatments: The G-Formula.

European journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Improving Scientific Research: Renegotiated Principles of Science, Proposals, Failures, and Successes.

European journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Beta-Blockers After Myocardial Infarction With Preserved and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis.

European journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Prognostic Role of Serum Albumin Levels in Elderly Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

European journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Circulating Human Epididymis Protein 4 Predicts 10-Year Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.

European journal of clinical investigation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.1K

Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data.

Iztok Hozo1, Athanasios Tsalatsanis2, Benjamin Djulbegovic2,3,4

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Gary, IN, USA.

European Journal of Clinical Investigation
|January 3, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Monte Carlo (MC) simulation enables decision curve analysis (DCA) using aggregate data, eliminating the need for individual patient data. This approach yields identical results to traditional DCA, broadening its applicability for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models.

Keywords:
Decision curve analysisMonte Carlo simulationmedical decision making

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Health Economics
  • Clinical Decision Making

Background:

  • Decision curve analysis (DCA) is crucial for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models.
  • Traditional DCA requires individual patient data, limiting its widespread application.
  • Monte Carlo (MC) simulation offers a potential method to overcome data limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a Monte Carlo (MC) decision model for applying DCA using aggregate data.
  • To compare the results of MC-simulated DCA with traditional DCA using individual patient data.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed an MC decision model to simulate individual outcome probabilities.
  • Contrasted simulated probabilities against indifference threshold probabilities for management strategies.
  • Compared MC DCA results with patient data DCA for three published decision models (statin use, hospice referral, prostate cancer surgery).

Main Results:

  • MC DCA and patient data DCA produced identical results across all tested models.
  • MC DCA could have been used to inform decisions on statin use, hospice referral, and prostate surgery.
  • Accurate aggregate parameters on outcome probabilities and treatment effects ensure indistinguishable MC DCA results from individual patient data DCA.

Conclusions:

  • A simple, user-friendly MC model facilitates wider adoption of DCA.
  • This method enhances the evaluation of diagnostic tests and predictive models using only aggregate data.
  • Expands the utility of DCA for research and clinical practice where individual patient data is unavailable.