Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Replication in Eukaryotes02:31

Replication in Eukaryotes

206.6K
Overview
206.6K
Replication in Eukaryotes01:29

Replication in Eukaryotes

18.4K
In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication is highly conserved and tightly regulated. Multiple linear chromosomes must be duplicated with high fidelity before cell division, so there are many proteins that fulfill specialized roles in the replication process. Replication occurs in three phases: initiation, elongation, and termination, and ends with two complete sets of chromosomes in the nucleus.
Many Proteins Orchestrate Replication at the Origin
Eukaryotic replication follows many of the same...
18.4K
Replication in Prokaryotes02:35

Replication in Prokaryotes

100.6K
Overview
100.6K
Replication in Prokaryotes01:32

Replication in Prokaryotes

28.7K
DNA replication has three main steps: initiation, elongation, and termination. Replication in prokaryotes begins when initiator proteins bind to the single origin of replication (ori) on the cell's circular chromosome. Replication then proceeds around the entire circle of the chromosome in each direction from the two replication forks, resulting in two DNA molecules.
Many Proteins Work Together to Replicate the Chromosome
Replication is coordinated and carried out by a host of specialized...
28.7K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

274.0K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
274.0K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.7K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>Clonorchis sinensis</i> and Cholangiocarcinoma.

Journal of Korean medical science·2025
Same author

JKMS Editing With Gratitude.

Journal of Korean medical science·2023
Same author

Review of Recent Prevalence of Urogenital Schistosomiasis in Sub-Saharan Africa and Diagnostic Challenges in the Field Setting.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Programmatic Implications for Schistosomiasis Elimination Based on Community-Based Survey in the Blue Nile, North Kordofan, and Sennar States, Sudan.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Citation Activity of <i>Journal of Korean Medical Science</i> in 2011-2020: Reflection on the Most and Least Cited Items.

Journal of Korean medical science·2022
Same author

Launching of Case Conference for CME in <i>Journal of Korean Medical Science</i>.

Journal of Korean medical science·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.1K

Plagiarism Continues to Affect Scholarly Journals.

Sung Tae Hong1

  • 1Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hst@snu.ac.kr.

Journal of Korean Medical Science
|January 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Journal editors face significant plagiarism challenges, including copyright infringement and modified text overlap. Current detection systems need improvement to ensure scholarly integrity and prevent misconduct in scientific publishing.

Keywords:
CopyCrosscheckEditorsPlagiarismRetractionScholarly JournalsSimilarity Check

More Related Videos

Plaquing of Herpes Simplex Viruses
04:41

Plaquing of Herpes Simplex Viruses

Published on: November 5, 2021

7.2K
Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance
09:00

Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance

Published on: May 2, 2018

12.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.1K
Plaquing of Herpes Simplex Viruses
04:41

Plaquing of Herpes Simplex Viruses

Published on: November 5, 2021

7.2K
Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance
09:00

Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance

Published on: May 2, 2018

12.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Publishing
  • Scholarly Communication
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) editor encountered three plagiarism cases: figure copying, manuscript resubmission, and unauthorized republication.
  • Two cases involved copyright violations, with limited action from the involved journals.

Discussion:

  • Slightly modified copied articles were initially missed by plagiarism detection software (Crosscheck).
  • One case showed a 96% overlap after a year, while another showed 3% similarity, highlighting system limitations.
  • Plagiarism, sometimes facilitated by corrupt editing companies and unethical researchers, undermines the credibility of scientific enterprises.

Key Insights:

  • Plagiarism remains a persistent threat to the trustworthiness of scholarly publishing.
  • Existing text-overlap detection systems require upgrades for more reliable screening.
  • Editors face a substantial burden in identifying and addressing plagiarism.

Outlook:

  • Enhanced vigilance and improved technological solutions are crucial for preventing academic misconduct.
  • Strengthening international cooperation may be necessary to address cross-border plagiarism issues.
  • Upholding ethical standards in scientific publishing is paramount for maintaining public trust.