Comparative Transcriptome Profiles of Human Blood in Response to the Toll-like Receptor 4 Ligands Lipopolysaccharide

Liming Luan1, Naeem K Patil1, Yin Guo2

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Scientific Reports
|January 6, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activate similar gene expression profiles in human leukocytes. However, LPS more potently induces pro-inflammatory responses, while MPLA retains immunomodulatory activity with less inflammation.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Transcriptomics

Background:

  • Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) is a less toxic derivative of lipopolysaccharide (LPS).
  • MPLA is used as a vaccine adjuvant and immunomodulator.
  • Differential leukocyte responses to MPLA and LPS require characterization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the differential transcriptomic response of human blood to LPS and MPLA.
  • To elucidate the distinct immune activation pathways triggered by LPS and MPLA.

Main Methods:

  • Human venous blood from volunteers was stimulated with LPS, MPLA, or vehicle.
  • Gene expression profiling was performed using microarray analysis.
  • Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was used to interpret transcriptomic data.

Main Results:

  • LPS and MPLA differentially regulated 136 and 130 genes, respectively.
  • Both ligands shared 74 up-regulated and 9 down-regulated genes.
  • LPS more potently induced pro-inflammatory cytokine and inflammasome-associated transcripts.
  • CCL7, a macrophage-regulating chemokine, was preferentially up-regulated by MPLA.

Conclusions:

  • LPS and MPLA induce largely similar transcriptional profiles in human blood.
  • LPS is a more potent activator of pro-inflammatory and inflammasome responses.
  • MPLA demonstrates effective immunomodulatory activity with a less potent pro-inflammatory profile.