Closed vs open nailing for displaced middle third fracture of clavicle. Does it matter?
Hrushikesh Saraf1, Sarang Kasture2
1Shashwat Hospital, Kothrud, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Background:
Intramedullary nailing for fractures of middle third clavicle has become increasingly popular. Though open nailing has been widely described, closed nailing finds less mention.
Objectives:
In this study we compared closed nailing with open nailing in fractures of middle third of clavicle to assess if the former holds any advantage.
Material And Methods:
34 patients with closed nailing were compared to 31 patients with open nailing in terms of operative time, length of incision, pain, time to union and functional outcome.
Results:
Only operative time and length of incision were significantly more in open group than in closed group.
Discussion:
We believe that closed reduction can be attempted in all patients undergoing nailing for middle third clavicle fracture but surgeon should have a low threshold to open the fracture if closed reduction fails as functional outcome and time to union remains unaffected.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
04:41Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
