Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Probability and likelihood in genetic counselling.

A W Edwards1

  • 1Department of Community Medicine, University of Cambridge, England.

Clinical Genetics
|October 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"Canned philosophers".

The Eugenics review·2011
Same author

Natural selection and the sex ratio: Fisher's sources.

The American naturalist·2008
Same author

Carl Düsing (1884) on the regulation of the sex-ratio.

Theoretical population biology·2000
Same author

Energy and macronutrient intake in relation to dental caries incidence in urban black South African preschool children in 1991 and 1995: the Birth-to-Ten study.

Public health nutrition·2000
Same author

The genetical theory of natural selection.

Genetics·2000
Same author

Sewall Wright's equation Deltaq=(q(1-q) partial differentialw/ partial differentialq)/2w.

Theoretical population biology·2000

This paper clarifies risk calculation in genetic counseling, emphasizing probability and likelihood. It discusses interpretation challenges and the need for assumed prior probabilities in complex genetic risk assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Genetic counseling relies on accurate risk assessment.
  • Interpreting statistical measures of risk can be complex.
  • Previous statistical debates (e.g., Fisher-Neyman) inform current methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify concepts in genetic risk calculation.
  • To review the use of probability and likelihood in risk assessment.
  • To discuss interpretation challenges and potential ethical dilemmas.

Main Methods:

  • Review of probability and likelihood concepts.
  • Application of likelihood to risk probabilities.
  • Discussion of inferential statistical methods (e.g., fiducial inference).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Risk is best measured by probability.
  • Likelihood offers a technical approach to risk probabilities.
  • Distinctions are necessary between calculating risk and inferring genotypes.
  • Non-1:1 relationships between parameters and risk pose challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Prior probabilities may need to be assumed for risk assessment.
  • The paper serves as a guide for discussing complex risk calculation issues.
  • Understanding these concepts is crucial for informed genetic counseling and ethical considerations.