Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Detection of Plasmodium Sporozoites in Anopheles Mosquitoes using an Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Published on: September 30, 2021
Guidelines for the Direct Detection of Anaplasma spp. in Diagnosis and Epidemiological Studies
Cornelia Silaghi1, Ana Sofia Santos2, Jacinto Gomes3
11 National Center for Vector Entomology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland .
Abstract:
The genus Anaplasma (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) comprises obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacteria that are mainly transmitted by ticks, and currently includes six species: Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma centrale, Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, and Anaplasma ovis. These have long been known as etiological agents of veterinary diseases that affect domestic and wild animals worldwide. A zoonotic role has been recognized for A. phagocytophilum, but other species can also be pathogenic for humans. Anaplasma infections are usually challenging to diagnose, clinically presenting with nonspecific symptoms that vary greatly depending on the agent involved, the affected host, and other factors such as immune status and coinfections. The substantial economic impact associated with livestock infection and the growing number of human cases along with the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections, determines the need for accurate laboratory tests. Because hosts are usually seronegative in the initial phase of infection and serological cross-reactions with several Anaplasma species are observed after seroconversion, direct tests are the best approach for both case definition and epidemiological studies. Blood samples are routinely used for Anaplasma spp. screening, but in persistently infected animals with intermittent or low-level bacteremia, other tissues might be useful. These guidelines have been developed as a direct outcome of the COST action TD1303 EURNEGVEC ("European Network of Neglected Vectors and Vector-Borne Diseases"). They review the direct laboratory tests (microscopy, nucleic acid-based detection and in vitro isolation) currently used for Anaplasma detection in ticks and vertebrates and their application.
Insights
Anaplasma bacteria cause significant animal and human diseases. Direct laboratory tests are crucial for accurate diagnosis due to nonspecific symptoms and limitations of serological methods.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- The genus Anaplasma includes tick-borne obligate intracellular bacteria causing significant veterinary diseases globally.
- While Anaplasma phagocytophilum is zoonotic, other species can also infect humans, posing public health risks.
- Anaplasma infections present nonspecific symptoms, complicating clinical diagnosis and necessitating reliable laboratory detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review direct laboratory diagnostic methods for Anaplasma detection in ticks and vertebrates.
- To provide guidelines for accurate case definition and epidemiological studies of Anaplasma infections.
- To address the need for improved diagnostic accuracy due to economic impacts and emerging human cases.
Main Methods:
- Review of direct detection techniques including microscopy, nucleic acid-based assays (e.g., PCR), and in vitro isolation.
- Evaluation of sample types, with blood being routine but other tissues considered for persistent infections.
- Guidelines developed from the COST action TD1303 EURNEGVEC.
Main Results:
- Direct diagnostic tests are superior to serology due to early-stage seronegativity and cross-reactivity issues.
- Microscopy, molecular methods, and culture offer different advantages for Anaplasma detection.
- Blood is a common sample, but alternative tissues may be necessary for low-level or intermittent bacteremia.
Conclusions:
- Accurate laboratory diagnosis of Anaplasma infections is essential for veterinary and human health.
- Direct detection methods are recommended over serological tests for reliable Anaplasma diagnosis and surveillance.
- Further research and standardization of direct tests are vital for managing Anaplasma-related diseases.

