Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
Published on: April 28, 2023
Principles for Assessing Adversity in Toxicologic Clinical Pathology.
Lila Ramaiah1, Lindsay Tomlinson2, Niraj K Tripathi3
11 Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Determining adversity for clinical pathology (CP) biomarkers in preclinical studies requires context. Most CP changes are not adverse alone but support overall findings, needing an integrated interpretation approach.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Biomarker Discovery
- Preclinical Safety Assessment
Background:
- Limited regulatory guidance exists for determining biomarker adversity in preclinical safety studies.
- Clinical pathology (CP) biomarkers are crucial but often lack clear interpretation frameworks for adverse effects.
- Existing literature offers insufficient direction on assessing the significance of CP biomarker changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a consensus opinion on the principles and approach for assessing adversity of clinical pathology biomarkers in preclinical safety studies.
- To provide guidance for toxicologic pathologists on interpreting CP data within a regulatory context.
- To address the need for a standardized method for evaluating the adverse potential of CP biomarkers.
Main Methods:
- A consensus-building process involving experts from the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology-Regulatory Affairs Committee and the Society of Toxicologic Pathology-Clinical Pathology Interest Group.
- Identification and discussion of key principles, overall approaches, and unique considerations for CP data interpretation.
- Emphasis on pathophysiologic context and a weight-of-evidence approach for assessing biomarker adversity.
Main Results:
- Most clinical pathology biomarkers are not considered adverse in isolation, irrespective of the magnitude of change.
- CP biomarkers often quantify effects, support pathogenetic understanding, and serve as translational biomarkers.
- Adversity is typically determined by a constellation of findings, requiring integrative interpretation with other study data.
Conclusions:
- Clinical pathology biomarker changes should not be interpreted in isolation; contextual and integrative interpretation is essential.
- A weight-of-evidence approach, considering pathophysiologic context, is critical for assessing biomarker adversity.
- Exceptions exist for critical CP changes lacking correlates that signify a health risk in the tested species.
More Related Videos
09:33Imaging Approaches to Assessments of Toxicological Oxidative Stress Using Genetically-encoded Fluorogenic Sensors
Published on: February 7, 2018
11:38High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
Published on: May 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Toxicokinetics: Overview
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions
Drug Toxicity: Overview
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors