Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Young children's causal inferences.

P Das Gupta1, P E Bryant

  • 1Cognitive Development Unit, Medical Research Council, London.

Child Development
|October 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimation of demographic measures for India, 1881-1961, based on census age distributions.

Population studies·2011
Same author

Evaluation of synthetic antiseptics.

The Antiseptic·2010
Same author

Does single-dose cell resistance to the radio-mimetic zeocin correlate with a zeocin-induced adaptive response in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains?

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2008
Same author

A role for topoisomerase II alpha in the formation of radiation-induced chromatid breaks.

British journal of cancer·2008
Same author

Trapping and manipulation of low-index particles in a two-dimensional interferometric optical trap.

Optics letters·2007
Same author

Induction of DNA double-strand breaks by zeocin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the role of increased DNA double-strand breaks rejoining in the formation of an adaptive response.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2007
Same journal

Comprehension of "can" predicts performance on a nonverbal measure of modal concepts at 48 but not 36 months.

Child development·2026
Same journal

An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort.

Child development·2026
Same journal

If moms do it, it can't be that important: Children's reasoning about gender disparities in domestic work.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Adapting under stress: How sociocultural stress intensity and fluctuation shape youth school engagement and internalizing symptoms.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Children across diverse societies exchange reasons to resolve disagreements.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Beyond resources: Children in India and Germany have a multifaceted concept of fairness.

Child development·2026
See all related articles

Children aged 3 to 4 years show significant development in making causal inferences. Four-year-olds demonstrated a greater ability to identify the correct cause of event sequences compared to three-year-olds.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Causal Reasoning

Background:

  • Understanding causality is fundamental to cognitive development.
  • Children's ability to infer cause-and-effect relationships evolves significantly during early childhood.
  • Previous research indicates a developmental trajectory in causal reasoning, but specific age-related shifts require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the developmental changes in children's causal inference abilities between the ages of 3 and 4 years.
  • To examine how children attribute causality to sequences of events, considering initial and final states.
  • To identify the specific age at which children reliably distinguish between causes of initial versus resultant states.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two experiments were conducted involving children aged 3 and 4 years.
  • Participants were tasked with identifying the instrument responsible for changing an object's state.
  • Tasks varied in complexity, focusing on changes from noncanonical to noncanonical states and canonical to noncanonical states.

    • Main Results:

    • Three-year-olds incorrectly identified instruments causing the initial state rather than the overall change.
    • Four-year-olds demonstrated significantly improved accuracy in identifying the correct causal instrument.
    • Performance differences were noted based on the nature of the state change (canonical vs. noncanonical).

    Conclusions:

    • A critical developmental leap in causal inference occurs between 3 and 4 years of age.
    • This developmental improvement is linked to the ability to attend to the differences between initial and final states.
    • Children's capacity for genuine causal inference solidifies within this age range.