Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

7.1K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.1K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

4.2K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
4.2K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I01:26

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I

4.3K
A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains...
4.3K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.2K
Quantifying Work02:30

Quantifying Work

24.8K
As a system undergoes a change, its internal energy can change, and energy can be transferred from the system to the surroundings, or from the surroundings to the system.
24.8K
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

753
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
753

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring the relationships between Early Childhood Adversity, Social Cognition, and Aggression in a South African Study of People Living with Schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia research. Cognition·2025
Same author

Fluoropyrimidine type, patient age, tumour sidedness and mutation status as determinants of benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with EGFR monoclonal antibodies: individual patient data pooled analysis of randomised trials from the ARCAD database.

British journal of cancer·2024
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum: Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of Bariatric Physicians and Surgeons, Canadian Association of General Surgeons, Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons, Canadian Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Society, Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, London, Ont. Sept. 15-18, 2011.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

A wafer-scale fabrication method for three-dimensional plasmonic hollow nanopillars.

Nanoscale advances·2021
Same author

Comparing the Structured Multidisciplinary work Evaluation Tool (SMET) questionnaire with technical measurements of physical workload in certified nursing assistants in a medical ward setting.

Applied ergonomics·2021
Same author

The prevalence of mental health problems in sub-Saharan adolescents living with HIV: a systematic review.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England)·2021
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain, performance anxiety, and stress-producing life events among orchestral players in Brazil: An observational study.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

From dirty work to safety performance: A mixed-methods study on chemical workers' safety compliance and participation in China.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Interventions to manage back pain in agriculture, horticulture, and seafood workers - A scoping review.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Working under digital pressure: Electronic performance monitoring, psychological contracts, and job crafting among construction and engineering professionals.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

From exclusion to inclusion: How spiritual leadership shapes workplace relationships.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

An easier government? The impact of digital government platform on government employee overtime.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Structured Multidisciplinary work Evaluation Tool: Development and validation of a multidisciplinary work

P Haraldsson1, D Jonker1, E Strengbom1

  • 1Occupational Safety and Health Care, Region Jönköping County, Sweden.

Work (Reading, Mass.)
|January 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Structured Multidisciplinary work Evaluation Tool (SMET) questionnaire demonstrates excellent content, pragmatic, and communicative validity for occupational health services. This validated tool supports active participation and risk identification in workplace health evaluations.

Keywords:
Occupational health careparticipatory ergonomicsvaliditywork questionnaire

More Related Videos

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.4K
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.4K
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Psychometrics
  • Workplace Health Management

Background:

  • Occupational Health Services (OHS) effectiveness relies on active participation and multidisciplinary risk identification.
  • Existing questionnaires lacked a comprehensive approach, necessitating the development of a new tool.
  • The Structured Multidisciplinary work Evaluation Tool (SMET) was created to address this gap.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate the SMET questionnaire.
  • To assess the communicative, pragmatic, and content validity of the SMET.
  • To provide a tool for enhanced occupational health service delivery.

Main Methods:

  • Action research methodology was employed for questionnaire development.
  • Communicative and pragmatic validity were tested using action theory.
  • Content Validity Index (CVI) was utilized to evaluate content validity.

Main Results:

  • The SMET questionnaire demonstrated excellent content validity overall.
  • Questions addressing physically and psychosocially demanding factors showed excellent validity.
  • Questions on environmentally demanding factors exhibited good validity.

Conclusions:

  • The SMET questionnaire possesses strong content validity.
  • The development process confirmed good pragmatic and communicative validity for the SMET.
  • SMET is a validated tool for occupational health evaluations.