Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.6K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.6K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.6K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.7K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.9K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.9K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.5K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.6K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deaminative Fluorination of Sulfonamides via Aminocyclopropenium Activation.

Organic letters·2026
Same author

Amine-to-Halogen Exchange Enables an Amine-Acid Etherification.

JACS Au·2026
Same author

Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Dehydrogenative Allylation of Aldehydes.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Direct Acylation of Alkyl and Aryl Bromides via Nickel-Catalyzed Aldehyde C-H Functionalization.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2026
Same author

Bridges from Wavefunction Theory to Density Functional Theory.

Annual review of physical chemistry·2026
Same author

Numerical Integration of Slater Basis Functions Over Prolate Spheroidal Grids.

Journal of computational chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.7K

Recovering dynamic correlation in spin flip configuration interaction through a difference dedicated approach.

Alan D Chien1, Paul M Zimmerman1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|January 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary

New restricted-active-space n-spin flip configuration interaction models offer accurate, cost-effective treatment for polyradical systems. These advanced methods improve calculations for complex molecules, including those relevant to singlet fission.

More Related Videos

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells
14:12

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells

Published on: December 11, 2021

6.1K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.7K
Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells
14:12

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells

Published on: December 11, 2021

6.1K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum chemistry
  • Computational chemistry
  • Theoretical chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate treatment of polyradical systems and multi-excitonic states is computationally challenging.
  • Existing spin flip methods have limitations in capturing dynamic correlation.
  • Understanding singlet fission mechanisms requires precise energetics of excited states.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce and validate new restricted-active-space n-spin flip configuration interaction models (RAS(S)-SF and RAS(S,2h,2p)-SF).
  • Assess the performance of these models in describing ground and excited states of various chemical systems.
  • Investigate the applicability of these methods to large systems relevant to singlet fission.

Main Methods:

  • Development of restricted-active-space n-spin flip configuration interaction models.
  • Application of RAS(S)-SF and RAS(S,2h,2p)-SF to methylene, tetramethyleneethane, transition metal complexes, and tetracene dimers.
  • Comparison with the existing RAS(h,p)-SF method to evaluate dynamic correlation effects.

Main Results:

  • RAS(S,2h,2p)-SF significantly improves state descriptions across all tested systems.
  • High accuracy is achieved even with a minimal number of spin flips.
  • The double triplet state (1(TT)) in tetracene dimers is predicted to be unbound using a triple-zeta basis, contradicting previous studies.

Conclusions:

  • The new RAS(S)-SF and RAS(S,2h,2p)-SF models provide accurate and computationally efficient approaches for polyradical systems.
  • RAS(S,2h,2p)-SF offers substantial improvements in describing electronic states.
  • The findings provide crucial insights into the energetics of tetracene dimers and their potential for efficient singlet fission.