Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.0K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.0K
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

2.0K
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
2.0K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.1K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.5K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.5K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.6K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.6K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

24.4K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
24.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A response to EA-4/23 INF:2025 "The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO/IEC 17025:2017".

Forensic science international·2025
Same author

Key questions for modelling COVID-19 exit strategies.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2020
Same author

A Formal Treatment of Sequential Ignorability.

Statistics in biosciences·2014
Same author

Deep determinism and the assessment of mechanistic interaction.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2012
Same author

Probabilistic sensitivity analysis in health economics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2011
Same author

Response to: DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations.

Investigative genetics·2011
Same journal

When termites mimic disease: Vertebral osteolysis and indoor scene alteration in the French West Indies.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Forensic soil comparison for traffic accidents caused by soil clods on roadway.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Chemical profiling of counterfeit perfumes: insights within a forensic intelligence approach.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

The forensic limits of hair drug testing: a critical assessment of drug intake and hair concentration relationships.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Carrying the aftermath: forensic trauma as a predictable occupational injury in a lifecycle systems framework.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Footprint analysis in a subadult Slovak population (aged 10-18 years) for stature estimation: a preliminary study.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K

Forensic likelihood ratio: Statistical problems and pitfalls.

A Philip Dawid1

  • 1Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WB, UK.

Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|January 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This response identifies critical statistical errors in papers discussing the precision of forensic likelihood ratios. Addressing these measurement and reporting issues is essential for advancing the scientific and philosophical debate.

Keywords:
Bayes factorEstimationForensicLikelihood ratio

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

949

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

949

Area of Science:

  • Forensic science
  • Statistical analysis
  • Scientific methodology

Background:

  • Position papers on measuring and reporting forensic likelihood ratio precision were published.
  • These papers are part of a virtual special issue in Science & Justice.
  • A debate on the philosophical implications of these measurements is ongoing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To respond to position papers on forensic likelihood ratio precision.
  • To identify and highlight serious statistical errors in the published papers.
  • To emphasize the need for correcting these errors before further philosophical discussion.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of statistical methodologies used in the referenced papers.
  • Identification of specific statistical errors in measurement and reporting.
  • Analysis of the impact of these errors on the broader debate.

Main Results:

  • Several significant statistical errors were found in the analyzed papers.
  • The identified errors pertain to the measurement and reporting of forensic likelihood ratio precision.
  • These errors undermine the validity of current discussions.

Conclusions:

  • The statistical errors identified must be rectified.
  • Accurate statistical reporting is a prerequisite for meaningful philosophical debate in forensic science.
  • Further research should focus on robust statistical methods for likelihood ratios.